Home
Videos uploaded by user “TODAY NEWS”
Kavanaugh Accuser Humiliated! Students Come Forward, Reveal Embarrassing Secret
 
03:54
Over the weekend, Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford revealed herself as the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of an attempted rape thirty-five-years-ago. But hours later, Blasey Ford was humiliated when her past students came forward to reveal her embarrassing secret. In a Sunday interview, Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford revealed that she is Brett Kavanaugh’s high school-era accuser, claiming the judge pinned her down and groped her before she escaped some 35-years-ago. According to Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge was present at the time and witnessed the alleged assault. Judge has strongly denied the accusation, saying, “Now that the anonymous person has been identified and has spoken to the press, I repeat my earlier statement that I have no recollection of any of the events described in today’s Post article or attributed to her letter.” Now that Blasey Ford has revealed herself to the world, we have been able to glean a much clearer picture of the woman drawing on a “repressed memory” to accuse a well-respected judge of attempting to rape her decades ago. For example, the letter she penned to Feinstein wasn’t her first. She also signed a letter for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) condemning President Donald Trump for strictly enforcing federal immigration laws. And that’s not all that calls into question Blasey Ford’s credibility. Her reviews on RateMyProfessors.com paint a picture of a deranged woman who is the bain of any student unlucky enough to be sitting in her class. Overall, she scores 2.3 out of 5, which would be a failing grade if the roles were reversed. “Christine ford is the worst educator I have ever experienced,” one student wrote. “Avoid taking her class and avoid any interaction with this person. I feel like she has something wrong with her and I am surprised no one has caught this. Also avoid fullerton’s MSW program as long as she is there.” “Prof. Ford is unprofessional, lacks appropriate filters, and I am honestly scared of her,” wrote another student, who ultimately received an A in her class despite their displeasure with the professor. “She’s made comments both in class and in e-mails, if you cross her, you will be on her bad side. I fear to think of the poor clients that had to deal with her while she got her MSW and her LCSW. Absolutely the worst teacher I ever had.” “Do not take her class,” another student warned. “She is unclear with directions. Hard grader and talks for 2hr 45min without giving a break. she is exact opposite of what she teaches. empowering??? not at all.” Yet another student claimed that her teaching is so bad students will find themselves reaching for antidepressants. “Take her class and you will take antidepressant, start smoking or drinking again and gain 20lbs at your risk.” Yikes! All of the above reviews were written between the years of 2010 and 2014. This is not negative feedback Blasey Ford might have received after coming forward to accuse Kavanaugh. By contrast, it is near impossible to find someone with something negative to say about Kavanaugh. In fact, 65 women who knew the judge from his high school days wrote a letter vouching for his impeccable character and infallible habit of treating women with the utmost respect. From the looks of her reviews, however, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone with something positive to say about Christine Blasey Ford, let alone 65 people. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 63524 TODAY NEWS
A Surprise Witness Just Ended Hillary’s Life With One Bombshell Confession
 
03:23
Hillary Clinton’s worst nightmare just came true. A whistleblower came forward and implicated her in the worst scandal in American history. And this surprise witness just ended her life with one bombshell confession. The Deep State Plot Against Trump Takes A Surprise Twist Republicans continue to dig to get to the bottom of the Deep State plot to destroy Donald Trump. Lawmakers interviewed former top FBI lawyer James Baker behind closed doors. Baker resigned from the FBI back in May. He had worked closely with former FBI Director James Comey and left the FBI right before the Inspector General completed his report on the Hillary Clinton email probe. Comey praised Baker in a tweet following his retirement. He wrote: A GREAT PUBLIC SERVANT RETIRED FROM THE FBI TODAY. JIM BAKER’S INTEGRITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE RULE OF LAW HAVE BENEFITTED OUR COUNTRY THROUGH 5 PRESIDENTS, OF BOTH PARTIES. WE ARE FORTUNATE HE AND SO MANY OTHERS CHOOSE TO DEVOTE THEIR LIVES TO JUSTICE. Baker’s testimony stunned lawmakers. He confirmed everyone’s worst fears that Comey and his gang let politics influence their decision making. “Some of the things that were shared were explosive in nature,” Congressman Mark Meadows said. “This witness confirmed that things were done in an abnormal fashion. That’s extremely troubling.” In addition, Baker revealed that the FBI worked with a second source to provide anti-Trump intelligence during the campaign. “During the time that the FBI was putting — that DOJ and FBI were putting together the FISA (surveillance warrant) during the time prior to the election — there was another source giving information directly to the FBI, which we found the source to be pretty explosive,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. The Second Source’s Identity And Connection To Hillary Clinton Baker testified that law firm Perkins Coie’s attorney Michael Sussman gave the FBI documents and a thumb drive containing information about possible Trump-Russia collusion. Perkins Coie was the law firm Hillary Clinton laundered payments through to make it seem like she did not hire Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump. Baker’s testimony stunned lawmakers. A top FBI official admitted they used partisan dirt from the Democrats to spy on the Trump campaign. This scandal reached unheard of levels of shadiness. Baker provided direct testimony that the FBI and the Democrats had colluded during the campaign on covert operations against Donald Trump. The FBI used Sussman’s documents to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page. Page had left the campaign by the time the FBI obtained the warrant, but the warrant allowed the FBI to look back at all of Page’s communications. That means the FBI had access to Page’s emails while he was a member of the Trump team. Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints are all over this scandal. But if Democrats win control of the House, they will shut down the investigation into the Deep State for good. We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 151058 TODAY NEWS
You’ll Fall Out Of Your Chair When You See What Rush Limbaugh Just Predicted
 
03:20
The Brett Kavanaugh confirmation fight upended the 2018 elections. Democrats thought a blue was building that would wipe out the Republican Party. But you’ll fall out of your chair when you see what Rush Limbaugh just predicted because of the fight over confirming Brett Kavanaugh. Rush Limbaugh Exposes The Democrats Conservatives basked in the glow of their victory in confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Pundits immediately began guessing how the vote would affect the 2018 midterms. Democrats had been riding a wave of energy in key races. But the Kavanaugh fight changed everything. On a recent broadcast, Rush Limbaugh explained that the Democrats smear campaign could be the end of the party. “Now, when a baby makes a mess of itself in a diaper, yeah, there’s anger. But you get my point here. The natural state of a human being is not rage and anger. The natural state of humanity is not that as epitomized by the Democrat Party. Yet that has become the Democrat Party. I firmly believe — and I said this Friday, and even if it makes me sound naive, I’m gonna say it again. In a sane world, in a decent and just country, the actions of the American left just in the past two years would result in the biggest landslide electoral defeat of the Democrat Party’s lifetime,” Limbaugh stated. He continued, “There is not a single thing in a decent and just country that the American left, that the Democrat Party has done by virtue of its behavior that warrants the stamp of approval of winning elections. Yet they win them within their closely contained bases, districts, and states — their enclaves — which is actually a very small portion of this country in terms of square mileage. It’s population centers of the big cities on the coasts and in the Great Lakes.” The Democrats Crossed A Line The Democrats crossed a line in the Kavanaugh fight. Millions of Americans were outraged over their conduct. They could not believe Democrat Senators pushed hoaxes and fake news about Kavanaugh abusing women in order to force him to withdraw his nomination. The women accusing Kavanaugh were not credible. And many Americans believe they lied under oath. Democrats also promoted the talking point “believe the women.” But Americans rejected the idea of tossing due process and the presumption of innocence out the window. Just because a woman accuses someone of sexual misconduct doesn’t automatically make a person guilty. Millions of Americans were horrified with the kangaroo court the Democrats demanded. They realized it could be their sons who could one day have their lives ruined over false allegations. Both Donald Trump and Donald Trump, Jr. drove this point home. And in the days after the Senate confirmed Judge Kavanaugh, the true extent of the Democrats error became even clearer. Republican candidates in key Senate races saw a surge of support. Rush Limbaugh was right. Voters judged the Democrats tactics a disgrace and are prepared to punish them at the ballot box. We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 171470 TODAY NEWS
Ford’s High School Yearbook Scrubbed From Internet After Damning Pics Surface
 
04:42
On Monday, Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks were mysteriously scrubbed from the internet. As it turns out, those yearbooks allegedly contain some alarming evidence against the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of trying to rape her three and a half decades ago. Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford claims that Judge Brett Kavanaugh “physically and sexually assaulted” her during a party in the early 80’s when she was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, although two other people Ford claims were present when the alleged assault took place have denied that it ever happened. According to Infowars, cached images reportedly from Ford’s yearbooks, which cover her sophomore, junior, and senior years, the exact time frame when she claims the assault happened, portray a debauched environment of constant binge drinking and partying. “Lastly one cannot fail to mention the climax of the junior social scene, the party,” reads one passage believed to be from her yearbook. “Striving to extend our educational experience beyond the confines of the classroom, we played such intellectually stimulating games as Quarters, Mexican Dice and everyone’s favorite, Pass-Out, which usually resulted from the aforementioned two.” Another passage emphasizes how “loss of consciousness” at such parties meant that attendees only retained hazy memories of them. “And there were always parties to celebrate any occasion,” it reads. “Although these parties are no doubt unforgettable, they are only a memory lapse for most, since loss of consciousness is often an integral part of the party scene.” One page from “Chrissy” Blasey’s senior yearbook also describes how the girls would act like sexual predators towards younger boys. “Other seniors preferred to expand their horizons and date younger men, usually sophomores, who could bring the vitality and freshness of innocence to a relationship,” the yearbook reads. Another passage discusses a girl named Martha repeatedly throwing parties, one of which was attended by a male erotic dancer in gold g-string. “Cast parties, prom parties, post-game parties, pool parties, slumber parties, senior only parties, junior only parties – wherever you looked there were parties,” reads a passage from the yearbook dated 1982. The Cult of the First Amendment blog claimed to have saved copies of the yearbooks before they were scrubbed from the internet: On Monday Sept. 17th, Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks suddenly disappeared from the web. I read them days before, knew they would be scrubbed, and saved them. Why did I know they would be scrubbed? Because if roles were reversed, and Christine Blasey Ford had been nominated for the Supreme Court by President Trump, the headline by the resistance would be this: CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD AND THE DRUNKEN WHITE PRIVILEGED RACIST PLAYGIRLS OF HOLTON-ARMS. And it would be an accurate headline. That’s why the yearbooks have been scrubbed. They are a testament to the incredible power these girls had over their teachers, parents and the boys of Georgetown Prep, Landon and other schools in the area. In the pages below, you will see multiple photos and references to binge drinking and the accompanying joy of not being able to remember any of it. These yearbooks are, therefore, relevant to the national investigation now being conducted in the media, in homes, and in the halls of Congress. And they should not have been scrubbed. If Brett Kavanaugh’s yearbooks are fair game, so are these. These yearbooks allow us to glean a clearer picture of the girl Christine Blasey Ford was in high school, and after looking them over, it’s easy to see why she can’t recall key details of the night Brett Kavanaugh allegedly tried to rape her — it appears there is much about Ford’s high school years she cannot recall because of binge drinking. This is the character of the woman we are dealing with. Meanwhile, the man she has accused of rape some 35-years-ago has a much different reputation. He has been lauded by friends, colleagues, and ex-girlfriends as a perfect gentleman. Republicans have demanded that Blasey Ford testifies before Monday or the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh will move forward, but the judge’s accuser has refused. Now, with the credibility of her story rapidly falling apart, it is looking less and less likely that she will do so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 407629 TODAY NEWS
A Reporter Pointed Out One Fact That Caused Ford’s Story To Fall Apart
 
03:25
Christine Blasey Ford testified before the Senate. She spun a tale about Brett Kavanaugh trying to rape her in high school. But when she was done, a reporter pointed out the one fact that caused her story to fall apart. Christine Blasey Ford Testifies Ford testified on Thursday before the Senate Judiciary Committee. She faced questions from Rachel Mitchell, who was hired from the Maricopa County prosecutor’s office, and ten Democrats. The ten Democrats tossed softballs or made long speeches about her bravery. They wasted their time. Democrats wanted Ford to answer as few questions as possible. But one Democrat did ask questions. Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin asked Ford about a theory that a conservative activist named Ed Whelan had floated. He wondered if Ford had perhaps mistook Kavanaugh for another attacker. Durbin pressed her on this point. “In Judge Kavanaugh’s opening testimony – which we will hear after you leave, this is what he says: I never had any sexual or physical encounter of any kind with Doctor Ford,” Durbin began. He continued, “I am not questioning that Doctor Ford may have been sexually assaulted by some person, at some place, at some time.” “Last night, the Republican staff of this committee released to the media a timeline that shows they have interviewed two people who claim that they were the ones who actually assaulted you. I’m asking you to address this new defense of mistaken identity directly,” Durbin droned on. “Doctor Ford, with what degree of certainty do you believe Brett Kavanaugh assaulted you?” Durbin asked. “100 percent” Ford responded. A Reporter Points To Giant Hole In Ford’s Story Ford’s claim was just not believable. In her opening testimony, she stated she would not be able to provide answers or exact details about her story. Ford testified: “I DON’T HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS, AND I DON’T REMEMBER AS MUCH AS I WOULD LIKE TO. BUT THE DETAILS ABOUT THAT NIGHT THAT BRING ME HERE TODAY ARE ONES I WILL NEVER FORGET. THEY HAVE BEEN SEARED INTO MY MEMORY AND HAVE HAUNTED ME EPISODICALLY AS AN ADULT.” Observers noticed the gaps in the story. They held them up as evidence that she was not credible. Ford presented no evidence to back up her story. She admitted she could not remember significant details about the 1982 party or the events leading up to it. That’s why so many people found it odd that she definitively remembered it was Kavanaugh who attacked her. Benny Johnson of the Daily Caller tweeted: WE LEARNED TODAY THAT FORD CANNOT REMEMBER: – TIME/DATE/LOCATION OF PARTY – WHO DROVE HER TO PARTY – WHO WAS AT THE PARTY – WHO PUSHED HER INTO THE ROOM – WHO DROVE HER FROM THE PARTY – DATE/WHO PAID FOR HER POLYGRAPH – GRANDMOTHER’S FUNERAL DATE? BUT “100% SURE” IT WAS KAVANAUGH 36 YRS AGO Ford’s story was already collapsing going into the hearing. Her testimony cemented the fact that she was not a credible accuser. We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 127267 TODAY NEWS
Pelosi Caught Delivering Treasonous Deal To DOJ & FBI, Trump Makes Her Regret It
 
05:33
Nancy Pelosi has crossed the line, and she’s reached the point of no return. Pelosi, along with Chuck Schumer, has been busy blackmailing the swamp rats over at the DOJ and FBI to keep certain damning information from President Donald Trump. Well, Pelosi just got caught redhanded delivering the terms of the secret treasonous deal to the DOJ and FBI, and Trump is making her regret it, big time. You don’t want to miss this. The minute President Trump shocked the Democrats and their cohorts over at the DOJ and FBI by ordering the declassification of the FISA applications of Carter Page, along with the redaction of every Peter Strzok and Lisa Page text message, the swamp has been panicking. The Democrats and the swamp rats can’t afford for the truth to come out. But, there are certain factions the Democrats fear over at the DOJ and FBI, who may not be on board to stall this declassification. “U.S. intelligence officials, blindsided by President Donald Trump’s order that they make public highly sensitive files in the Russia investigation, are hoping the White House will allow them to conduct a formal declassification review and damage assessment before they are forced to release the documents, current and former officials tell NBC News,” the outlet reported. They add, “Senior executives at the FBI, Justice Department and Office of the Director of National intelligence were scrambling Tuesday to respond after being taken by surprise by a White House press release Monday directing them to release classified material they had previously determined should not be made public.” Yes, even though the president ordered the immediate declassification, it still must be done by the top officials at the DOJ and FBI. You’d think that ignoring a direct order from the president might be seen as disobeying a direct order or dereliction of duty, and you would be right. But, desperate times call for desperate measures, so Pelosi has just delivered the first shot across the bow. Nancy Pelosi, along with the approval of Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, and Mark Warner, the four Democrats who sit on the “Gang of Eight,” just delivered a shocking letter to those responsible for doing the declassification: Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Director of the ODNI Dan Coats. In this stunning letter is a treasonous admission, which Pelosi and her gang of four Democrats hoped would fly under the radar. The Conservative Treehouse explains the letter, reporting, “Perhaps more stunningly, and extra-constitutionally (meaning outside the framework of constitutional separation of power), within the jaw-dropping letter the four Democrats outline previous verbal conversations and current agreements with Coats, Rosenstein, and Wray where the Cabinet officers agreed to keep information away from the White House Chief Executive, the President.” Yeah, let that sink in. These swamp rats had secret verbal conversations. Of course, those communications excluded the GOP members on the Gang of Eight: Devin Nunes, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Richard Burr. And, in what is tantamount to blackmail, Pelosi is outing them as taking part in these treasonous conversations, squeezing them to not declassify the FISA applications nor make the redactions public. Pay special attention to the third paragraph: That third paragraph is particularly damning: “The verbal assurance you provided us that DOJ and FBI would not provide the White House or any of the Presiden’s attorneys with access to sensitive information briefed to a small group of designated Members.” “This letter reeks of corruption, manipulative intent, and between-the-lines admissions of gross intelligence abuses. Additionally, the appearance of a visible alignment between corrupt executive branch officials (Wray, Rosenstein, possibly Coats) and corrupt intelligence oversight officials (Schiff, Warner, Pelosi, Schumer) is jaw-droppingly obvious,” further explains The Conservative Treehouse. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 85564 TODAY NEWS
Trump Sinks Murkowski’s ENTIRE Career With One Brutal Statement
 
02:31
President Trump issued a warning to traitor Lisa Murkowski, the senator from Alaska who refused to vote “yes” on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Murkowski foolishly cited her “own conscience” as the reason why she did not vote to confirm Kavanaugh, forgetting that she’s there to represent her constituents in Alaska, not HER personal point of view. Trump correctly stated that the good people of Alaska would not forgive their traitorous senator, and would vote her out when her seat is up for grabs in 2022. We MUST get rid of these useless, traitor “Republicans” who refuse to serve their voters. No one cares what Lisa Murkowski believes — she’s supposed to be there as a voice for the people who elected her — and those people wanted Kavanaugh. Breitbart President Donald Trump warned Sen. Lisa Murkowski that she might face political retribution for her decision to oppose his nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. “I think she will never recover from this,” Trump said. “I think the people from Alaska will never forgive her for what she did.” The president commented about the process in an interview with the Washington Post that was published on Saturday. Murkowski voted against cloture for Kavanaugh’s confirmation on Friday. (On Saturday, Murkowski voted “no” on confirmation and later withdrew her vote to be marked “present” so that her Republican colleague in the Senate could attend his daughter’s wedding.) The Senate confirmed Kavanaugh on Saturday afternoon with a final vote of 50-48. Trump noted that he won Alaska easily over his failed challenger, Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, which might make it hard for Murkowski to remain in the Senate. He also reminded readers that he helped Alaska immensely by opening up drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The president had nothing but praise for Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who faced heavy pressure to vote against Kavanaugh but delivered a widely-praised speech in the Senate to explain why she would vote to confirm Kavanaugh. “I think what Susan Collins did for herself was incredibly positive,” Trump said in the interview. “It showed her to be an honorable, incredible woman. I think she’s got a level of respect that’s unbelievable. I really mean it.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 62346 TODAY NEWS
Hillary Is Fuming With Anger After Trump Destroyed Her At A Rally
 
02:57
There’s nothing more American than a Trump rally. President Trump knows exactly how to excite his base of support. He also knows how to infuriate his enemies, which he did after saying one thing to destroy Hillary Clinton. Hillary Loses To Trump Donald Trump winning the presidency is what Democrats feared more than anything. His victory flipped their lives upside down. And nobody took it worse than Hillary Clinton. She spent her entire life for that moment. Being President was something she felt was a guarantee. And she’s been going down a sad path of failure ever since. She released a book which flopped. Her book tour did so poorly, she found herself signing books in the back of grocery stores. There’s also speculation that her marriage with Bill is struggling. All while she has to watch President Trump do the job she wanted more than anything. President Trump knows this and sometimes talks about his former opponent. Trump Bashes Hillary At A Rally During a recent rally in Iowa, Trump didn’t hold back from going after Hillary Clinton. Trump mocked her for negotiating a “bad” trade deal with South Korea in 2012. “The deal was so bad,” Trump said. “That was a Hillary Clinton deal. It was so bad … she was secretary of state.” That’s when the crowd began chanting “lock her up.” Trump also mocked Hillary for her recently announced tour with her husband. They are traveling to a number of locations across North America to give speeches. “She made a statement today,” Trump said as the crowd chanted. “They’re doing a tour, her and her husband or something. She made a statement, some ridiculous … I said, well that’s why she lost the election. She’s never gotten it.” Trump went back to mocking her for the 2012 trade deal with South Korea. He mentioned her claim that she’d create 250,000 jobs in America if elected President: “You know, if she’d said for South Korea, at least she would have been honest, right?” The crowd loved it and cheered loudly. Lock Hillary Up “Lock her up” has become a popular chant at Donald Trump rallies. It began in response to the email scandal Hillary faced in 2016. She was caught using a private email server for classified information, putting our national security at risk. When the FBI investigated, then-director James Comey let her off the hook after barely looking into it. Trump supporters saw that as a miscarriage of justice. Had it been anybody else, they likely would have faced prosecution. But the Clintons get special treatment. Do you think Hillary should have been prosecuted? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 78034 TODAY NEWS
Feinstein Fights FBI From Discovering Ford’s Sick Secret, Trump Makes Her Regret It
 
06:47
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s handling of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations has been an utter disgrace. Now, explosive new information on Ford has caused Feinstein to freak out. The FBI could soon discover the sick secret that the Democrats, the leftist professor, and her attorneys have kept hidden all along. Well, Trump made Feinstein regret trying to influence the FBI, as the sick secret gets exposed. Well, the Democrats are already proving why this week-long FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh is not going to be enough for them. This past weekend, the new narrative by the usual suspects, including crazy Senator Mazie Hirano and disgraced fired former FBI Director James Comey, is that there should be no time limits nor any limits on the scope of what allegations the FBI can investigate. Stall, delay, and resist until the mid-terms is the Democrats’ plan. And the one person who really has no business in making demands on this FBI investigation, Senator Dianne Feinstein, has been caught doing just that. The New York Post reports, “Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to the White House counsel and the FBI director on Sunday asking for a copy of the directive issued to the FBI that lays out the scope of the investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.” “Given the seriousness of the allegations before the Senate, I am writing to request that you provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with a copy of the written directive sent by the White House to the FBI,” the California Democrat’s letter to counsel Don McGahn and director Christopher Wray says. “In addition, if the FBI requests any expansion beyond the initial directive, please provide the names of any additional witnesses or evidence,” the letter continued. But there’s more. Feinstein is worried about who the FBI talks to, and it all points to Christine Blasey Ford’s changing version of events. The Democrats working behind the scenes with Blasely Ford’s attorneys, Debra Katz, and Michael Bromwich, who are known Democratic operatives, allegedly helped alter Ford’s testimony to fit the 1982 time frame, so they are worried, very worried. According to Professor Margot Cleveland, who works as a freelance journalist, Ford’s therapist’s notes from 2012 state Ford said the attack happened in the “mid-80’s,” when she was in her “late teens” which is why her attorneys made Ford cross out certain words from her hand-written polygraph letter, and why the Democrats are so focused on Kavanaugh’s friend, Mark Judge, working at Safeway. Professor Cleveland explains the big cover-up, writing, “Let me ask you something. If a woman came forward and said that she was sexually assaulted in the summer of 1982 when she was 15 by one boy, with a second in the room egging her on, and to corroborate her claim she pointed to small portions of notes from a therapist. And those therapist notes said that she described a ‘rape attempt’ in her LATE teens that involved 4 boys. AND in her first text describing the attempted rape, the women said it happened in the mid-80s, what would you think? That the notes did NOT corroborate her account.” Cleveland adds, “But Ford has tricked everyone into ignoring the differences in dates (82 is not MID-80s) and age (15 is not LATE-teens) and to assume that Ford was telling her therapist about the supposed Kavanaugh attempt. BUT in her handwritten note before the polygraph, she crossed out “early” before 80’s. WHY?” Here’s why. We can show you how the Democrats and Ford’s attorneys altered her original story from “late teens” and “mid-80’s” to the exact year of 1982. You see, the mid-80’s and late teens would not work, as Kavanaugh, one year older than Ford, would be at Yale. Many wondered why the Democrats kept emphasizing Ford’s testimony concerning “running into Mark Judge at Safeway?” Remember Ford names Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge as being in the room during the alleged attack, and then she oddly kept emphasizing in her testimony, five different times, she ran into Judge at the Safeway grocery store, 6-8 weeks after this so-called rape attempt. It was only after Ford’s attorneys in doing opposition research on Kavanaugh did they discover a book written by Mark Judge, based loosely on his life. And in Judge’s book, he talks about working at Safeway in the summer of 1982. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 300280 TODAY NEWS
Trump Calls Deep State’s Bluff, Drops Mother of All Bombshells On Barack & Michelle
 
06:13
President Donald Trump understands the “art of the deal.” In politics, timing is everything. Trump will do things no other president has ever done before because he is faced with a group of high-level Washington, DC, insiders called the “Deep State” who are out to destroy him. Well, my fellow patriots, our president just called their bluff, dropping the mother of all bombshells right on Barack and Michelle Obama’s heads. You’ll love this. Does anyone ever wonder what happened to Barack Obama’s book deal? Remember, the big $65 million dollar-joint deal he and Michelle signed with Penguin Books. Well, Michelle finished her book, calling it “Becoming Michelle,” yet Barack just can’t seem to get his done. Well, now we know why. Poor Barack can’t finish his book about his days as president because of what he has been worried about ever since Trump got elected, he would have to lie or incriminate himself. The truth is, Barack is responsible for the biggest case of corruption ever in the history of the United States. If Watergate is the litmus test, then “Spygate” makes that corruption look like child’s play. Yes, we are talking about the former president having full knowledge that his FBI, DOJ, and CIA launched a bogus investigation into his party’s political rival, Donald Trump, and spied illegally on the Trump campaign and continued to do so after he was elected. For months, Americans have grown sick and tired of the game playing around the redacted portions of the FISA applications, especially the first FISA application on Carter Page which would reveal what evidence were these swamp rats using to spy on Trump. Now, the president has announced that he is done playing games. Trump just issued an order to declassify the FISA applications and so much more! “President Trump Monday ordered the declassification of several key documents related to the FBI’s probe of Russian actions during the 2016 presidential election, including an application for a renewed surveillance warrant against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page, and text messages from disgraced FBI figures Peter Strzok and Lisa Page,” reports Fox News. The documents to be declassified also include 12 FBI reports on interviews with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all other applications to surveil Carter Page. Trump also ordered the Justice Department to release text messages from a number of the key players in the Russia investigation “without redaction” — including former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Ohr, Strzok and Lisa Page. Understand the wording of Trump’s statement issuing this declassification is extremely important. This is political game playing, and the president can’t seem as if he is using his executive powers to benefit himself, even though that is exactly what he is doing — and has every right to do it. The Conservative Treehouse explains, “The president (WH counsel) is referencing ‘committee requests’, this is critical because it removes the legal conflict (executive self-interest) within the release; and makes the request a function of legislative branch oversight. Additionally, and importantly, the request calls for all of the prior text messages to be released without redactions.” Well, Rep. Devin Nunes, who has viewed the redacted portions, told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo that the mainstream media refuses to focus on the real corruption. Instead, they are “drinking the Russian kool-aid.” The Daily Caller reports, “House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said this week that Democrats and the media are likely to be ‘frightened’ by the information contained in Trump-Russia documents that Republicans are asking President Trump to declassify.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 25490 TODAY NEWS
Trump Keeps His Promise and Drops the HAMMER on Immigrant Welfare
 
03:21
True to his word, President Trump is cracking down on immigrants who are here on Visas, mooching off our welfare and entitlement programs. We’re not a welfare nation. American taxpayers are burdened enough – why on earth should we be expected to pay the way for illegals and immigrants. They’re not sending their best, and that needs to change. Trump’s administration is unveiling a new regulation that will do just that. Washington Examiner President Trump’s administration unveiled a new regulation to limit green cards and visas for immigrants who have received a various forms of welfare, the Department of Homeland Security announced Saturday. “This proposed rule will implement a law passed by Congress intended to promote immigrant self-sufficiency and protect finite resources by ensuring that they are not likely to become burdens on American taxpayers,” DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said, per NBC. The proposal is rooted in a federal law that restricts immigration for people “likely to become a public charge,” according to U.S. Customs and Immigration Services; a “public charge” is someone “primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.” A regulation promulgated in 1999 construed that law as applying only to cash benefits, NBC explained, but the new proposal would broaden the list of benefits. “The [disqualifying] benefits generally represent the largest federal programs for low-income people by total expenditure that address basic living needs such as income, housing, food, and medical care,” according to a DHS spokeswoman. That has been a priority of Attorney General Jeff Sessions for years, particularly when he was the top Republican on the Budget Committee during President Barack Obama’s tenure. Stephen Miller, a top communications aide when Sessions was in the Senate, is now a senior White House adviser. “It is an explicit and unambiguous tenet in federal law that those granted entry into the U.S. must be able to support themselves financially,” Sessions’ team argued in 2013. In sum: Despite laws to the contrary, virtually no one is being turned away from the United States for relying on federal welfare.” Immigrant advocates argue that it will harm poor immigrants, even those who already live in the U.S. with government assistance and have American citizens in their household. “This is a radical proposal to do an end run around Congress,” Jackie Vimo, policy analyst at the National Immigration Law Center in Washington, told the Los Angeles Times in August. “This will close the door to anyone except white, English-speaking, wealthy immigrants.” But Sessions warned about the financial cost of immigration throughout his tenure at the Budget Committee. “Encouraging self-sufficiency must be a bedrock for our immigration policy, with the goal of reducing poverty, strengthening the family, and promoting our economic values,” he said in 2013. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 26009 TODAY NEWS
The Alleged Story From Kavanaugh’s Accuser is ALREADY Falling Apart
 
01:56
The left will do ANYTHING To stop the Kavanaugh vote. They are fueled by blind desperation. Now, the so-called high school accuser has come forward, claiming she has PROOF of the attack, citing therapist notes from 2012, where she told her therapist about the Kavanaugh attack, and the media and the Democrats are RUNNING with this story, creating a wild frenzy. But wait, there are some very, very big problems with her story, starting with the fact that the therapist notes never mention Judge Kavanaugh, and claim that “4 boys” attacked her, while the accuser claims it was 2. She says the therapist notes are “wrong.” Good grief. Liberals are so godless and cruel, and desperate to retain power, that they will shamelessly and falsely smear a good man’s name and reputation without blinking an eye. Breitbart The Post obtained the therapist’s notes, although, the notes did not mention Kavanaugh. The records mention that she was attacked by students from “an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes claim that there were four boys involved, instead of just Ford and Kavanaugh. However, Ford claims that is an error on the therapist’s part. The accuser says that there were four boys at the party, but only Ford and Kavanaugh in the room. Ford is represented by Debra Katz, a liberal Democrat activist lawyer who has publicly touted that she is part of “the Resistance” to President Trump and his agenda. Ford has also donated to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) 2016 presidential campaign. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 38473 TODAY NEWS
Ford Freaks As Man At Kavanaugh Party Comes Forward, Tells What Really Happened
 
04:51
According to Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford, there were four high school boys present at the party where Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly tried to rape her some thirty-five-years-ago. We’ve already heard from one of those men, Mark Judge, who has categorically denied the accusations. Now, another one of the men has come forward to reveal what really happened that night. The Daily Caller reports that Patrick J. Smyth, one of the men who was allegedly at the party where Brett Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford in the 1980s, does not even remember the party and therefore denies the allegations of misconduct against Kavanaugh. Smyth’s lawyer, Eric Bruce, wrote a letter about his client’s recollection of the alleged event, and it will be sent to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) on Wednesday. In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, another former classmate of Brett Kavanaugh’s denies attending a party like the one described in the allegation made by Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexually assaulting her three decades ago when they were teenagers. Patrick J. Smyth attended Georgetown Prep — an all-boys school in North Bethesda, Maryland — alongside Kavanaugh. Both men graduated in 1983. Smyth signed a letter this summer, before the allegations against Kavanaugh were made public, testifying that Kavanaugh “is singularly qualified to be an Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court,” along with dozen other of the school’s alumni. Eric Bruce, who is representing Smyth, authored a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the committee. CNN has obtained a copy of the letter, which includes a quote from Smyth denying seeing any “improper conduct” from Kavanaugh. [Source: CNN] “I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in the statement. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 294255 TODAY NEWS
President Trump Fires Obama’s Most Destructive Swamp Slug
 
02:42
He’s gone for good. Sometimes, things move fast. Sometimes things move very fast. The past week has brought on revelation after another of deep state slugs in our government. We learned that employees of various agencies were working against the administration. Once that news broke, investigations were launched. This weekend a major story came out alleging a top official was trying to oust the president to help the Democrats. Before the dust settles, he’s already out. From Axios: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein has verbally resigned to Chief of Staff John Kelly in anticipation of being fired by President Trump, according to a source with direct knowledge. Per a second source with direct knowledge: “He’s expecting to be fired,” so he plans to step down… Rosenstein talked last year about invoking the 25th Amendment and wearing a wire during Trump meetings, the N.Y. Times’ Adam Goldman and Michael S. Schmidt reported last week. He denied both allegations. Initially, Rosenstein denied the allegations. He even said the comments were done in jest. Maybe they weren’t. Considering the story came from the New Yorker Times—once again citing anonymous sources—there is plenty of skepticism. The Times, along with all left-wing news, has been incredibly dishonest. There was a good reason to think that Rosenstein was being framed. News of his resignation seems to further confirm he was working against the Trump administration, even though Donald hired him. Obviously, he was working to help Obama and his cronies from behind the scenes. But are we still being duped? It’s possible Rosenstein, exposed for his corruption, is resigning before an investigation can uncover his wrongdoing. Or, humiliated over a false story, he’s trying to bow out gracefully. Then there is the possibility that Trump is once again playing the media for fools. How long before Rosenstein appears on CNN or MSNBC, making wild claims about the administration? Much like Omarosa did when she was canned? Perhaps Rosenstein is a fall guy—being used to trick the Left. Or perhaps he is the swamp slug the Times paints him to be. Our takeaway? The Left will do whatever it can to sow mistrust among Americas. They want us to believe the White House is in total chaos. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 51154 TODAY NEWS
Federal Judge Releases Benghazi Evidence – Hillary Goes Into Complete Panic
 
05:07
It appears that it’s time for Hillary Clinton to “come to heel.” That massive closet full of skeletons she’s thought was locked up has been swung wide open as a brave federal judge released the Benghazi evidence we’ve all been waiting on. Hillary may have thought she was above the law, but these heroes she ignored who died fighting because of her negligence deserve justice. Fox News reports: In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth also said he was “shocked” and “dumbfounded” when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton’s server, according to a court transcript of his remarks. “I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” Lamberth said during the hearing. The Department of Justice’s Inspector General (IG), Michael Horowitz, noted in a bombshell report in June that it was “inconsistent with typical investigative strategy” for the FBI to allow Mills to sit in during the agency’s interview of Clinton during the email probe, given that classified information traveled through Mills’ personal email account. “[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness’ interview,” the IG wrote. Lamberth, who was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan, said he did not know Mills had been granted immunity until he “read the IG report and learned that and that she had accompanied [Clinton] to her interview.” The transparency group Judicial Watch initially sued the State Department in 2014, seeking information about the response to the Benghazi attack after the government didn’t respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Other parallel lawsuits by Judicial Watch are probing issues like Clinton’s server, whose existence was revealed during the course of the litigation. The State Department had immediately moved to dismiss Judicial Watch’s first lawsuit on a motion for summary judgment, saying in an affidavit that it had conducted a search of all potentially relevant emails in its possession and provided them. The affidavit noted that some more documents and emails could be forthcoming. But Lamberth denied the request to dismiss the lawsuit at the time — and on Friday, he said he was happy he did, charging that State Department officials had intentionally misled him because other key documents, including those on Clinton’s email server, had not in fact been produced. “It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system,” Lamberth said Friday. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 293827 TODAY NEWS
These Records Show Ford LIED About Being A Licensed Psychologist – HUGE Cover Up Underway
 
05:38
So it seems like Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser has committed perjury when she testified under oath at a Senate hearing on Thursday. When Dr. Christine Blasey Ford testified under oath last week she identified herself as a “psychologist.” And when she said this she may have perjured herself under California state law. After she thanked members of the committee on Thursday after she was placed under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.” The problem here is the word “psychologist.” Ford may have misrepresented herself and her credentials. And if this is indeed the case, those are infractions which are taken very seriously in the psychological field and under California Law. Here is more on this via Dangerous: “Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam. According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive. Ford also does not appear to have been licensed in any other states outside California. Since graduating with a PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996 it does not appear Ford has spent any significant amount of time outside the state. She married her husband in California in 2002, and completed a master’s degree in California in 2009. She reportedly completed an internship in Hawaii, but a search of Hawaii’s Board of Psychology licensing database also did not turn up any results for Ford. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 90096 TODAY NEWS
Female Physician Comes Forward, Drops Bomb About Kavanaugh Ford Never Saw Coming
 
05:06
In the wake of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, a female physician has come forward with a bombshell admission about the well-respected judge. You can bet that Christine Blasey Ford never saw this one coming… In the wake of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, a female physician’s testimonial has gone viral on social media. The story was shared on Facebook by staunch Kavanaugh supporter Marjie Lewis, who identified the author as “a Female Physician who was wild in college.” Lewis explained, “The author of this testimonial is not me. The doctor who wrote this is a friend of my medical friend, so I can vouch for its authenticity.” According to the anonymous female physician, what is happening to Brett Kavanaugh “is not Justice.” She wrote, “I was immersed in the party scene in college. I drank to excess. I had blackout nights. I WAS GROPED AT FRAT PARTIES. If advances were unwanted I pushed the person away and set personal boundaries. I chose to be a part of the party scene. Because of this, I had fun and I have regrets. I HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED AND NOT RAPED. I could replay a scenario like Christine Ford described as very similar to things that happened when excessive drinking occurred in my own experiences,” she admitted. “At the age of 25, I settled down and now my idea of excitement is Netflix and yoga pants. If any of my current patients saw my behavior back then, I could understand why they wouldn’t want me to care for them,” added the anonymous physician. “I feel like being a physician is every bit as important as being a Supreme Court Justice. The decisions we make over the span of our careers could change the lives of thousands of people and their descendants for years to come. The same can be said for the Supreme Court or any other political office held.” “The thing is, poor choices in the past does not, and should not disqualify them,” she wrote. “I chugged bankers club whiskey in a cornfield and peed behind a dumpster 25 years ago. But Friday I used tiny instruments to remove infected bony partitions from the ethmoid sinus a few millimeters away from the brain. Should I have a right to operate on humans despite my past? You are damn right I do. You know why? Because I spent 20 years educating myself and sacrificing countless hours to get there. I gave up so much to be good at what I do, to be confident enough in myself to put myself out there to care for people who put their lives in my hands. My hands are capable in spite of my weaknesses of the past.” “Character is built partially on learning from mistakes,” the female physician went on. “Brett Kavanaugh has devoted his life to public service and the past 20 years of his life is the definition of integrity. He deserves this appointment. I AM AGAINST THE WEAPONIZATION OF VICTIMHOOD. Believing unequivocally the woman is right every single time no matter what is giving women power to take out anyone in their path. That is not equality. This radical position is not the answer to gender discrimination and victims rights.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 75991 TODAY NEWS
Maxine Waters Officially Requested To Resign
 
05:21
Republican Congressman Andy Biggs from Arizona introduced a measure on Monday calling on the Democrat congresswoman from California Maxine Waters to apologize to the White House for “endangering their lives and sowing seeds of discord.” The initiative also asks for censure with would force the congresswoman from her position and to release a public statement saying harassment or violence isn’t a form of protest. This measure comes after Waters encouraged harassment of Trump White House administration officials over the weekend at a rally in Los Angeles. Last weekend the Congresswoman said told anyone who sees members from Trump’s Cabinet in a restaurant, or a department store, or at a gasoline station, to create a crowd in order to push back on them. And to tell them “they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” These comments obviously sparked condemnation across the political spectrum, from both sides of the aisle. She later told MSNBC that protesters are “going to absolutely harass them.” Here is more via Newsmax: “The California Democrat told MSNBC, “These members of his Cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they’re not going to be able to go to a restaurant, they’re not going to be able to stop at a gas station, they’re not going to be able to shop at a department store. The people are going to turn on them. They’re going to protest. They’re absolutely going to harass them until they decide that they’re going to tell the president, ‘No, I can’t hang with you.’ This is wrong. This is unconscionable.” She was referring to several instances where the public has already angrily confronted White House officials in public spaces over the administration’s “zero tolerance” policy toward illegal immigrants, which led to the separation of parents from their children. Waters emphasized, “I have no sympathy for these people that are in this administration who know it’s wrong what they’re doing on so many fronts, but they tend to not want to confront this president or even leave, but they know what they’re doing is wrong.” The Biggs’ initiative states that Waters’ statements could “directly and unnecessarily lead to public unrest, physical violence, and physical injury.” Not a far-fetched notion since members of the cabinet have already been harassed before. The initiative currently has the full support of five members of Congress. Biggs told The Hill that Waters’ comments do “not become somebody who’s in Congress” and that “everybody agrees that it was just highly objectionable what she did.” Here is more on this breaking news via Fox News: “A Republican Congressman on Monday introduced an initiative to censure California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters and ask for her resignation after she encouraged others to confront Trump administration officials. Rep. Andy Biggs, R-AZ., introduced a measure calling on the congresswoman to apologize to the White House for “endangering their lives and sowing seeds of discord,” resign from her position, and release a public statement saying harassment or violence isn’t a form of protest. The measure comes after Waters encouraged harassment of Trump administration officials over the weekend at a rally in Los Angeles. “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she said, sparking condemnation across the political spectrum. She later told MSNBC that protesters are “going to absolutely harass them.” The Biggs’ motion claims that Waters’ statements could “directly and unnecessarily lead to public unrest, physical violence, and physical injury” and that members of the administration have already been harassed in public. The motion reportedly already attracted the support of five members of Congress. Biggs told The Hill that Waters’ comments do “not become somebody who’s in Congress” and that “everybody agrees that it was just highly objectionable what she did.” “So we just introduced it, we have some co-sponsors, but what she did was to basically incite people to come after and attack members of the president’s cabinet,” he said. “And also spread that out to more people.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 144199 TODAY NEWS
The Ratings Are in on NFL’s Season Opener and It’s BAD, Folks!
 
02:25
Thursday Night football kicked off last night. And the ratings are in….and it’s BAD news again for the sagging NFL. Ratings for the failing and disgraced NFL are down by a whopping 8% from this time last year, which were already sagging from the year before. Breitbart The NFL season opener between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Atlanta Falcons did not impress either on the field or in the television ratings. The Eagles managed to do enough to survive the challenge from Atlanta and win by a final score of 18-12. However, in a game that saw the defending champs booed by their own fans, viewers nationwide turned out to be equally disappointed. According to Deadline Hollywood: With a 13.4/5 in the metered markets, the post-midnight ending game is down 8% from last year’s kickoff of September 7, 2017. In one of the lowest season openers ratingswise and facing portions of a cable news-covered rally by a very NFL critical President Donald Trump, last night’s game is not only down from last year, but 2016, 2015 and 2014 – all of which saw successive declines. To add more injury to that, the 2017 8:42 PM ET-starting season opener between the victorious Kansas City Chiefs and New England Patriots ended up with a weak 7.7/29 rating among adults 18-49 and 21.8 million viewers. That was a double digit decline from 2016 and the worst total audience an opening game had since 2009. NFL ratings have collapsed over the last two years. The league saw an approximate ten percent decline in 2017, and a seven percent decline in 2016. Perhaps not coincidentally, those two years were dominated by the anthem protests begun by former 49er Colin Kaepernick in the preseason of 2016. As the league enters the 2018 season, there is still no resolution to the anthem protest issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 36672 TODAY NEWS
Ingraham Digs Into Kavanaugh Accuser’s Past, Finds Sick Skeleton In Her Closet
 
05:07
Over the weekend, Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford revealed herself as the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of an attempted rape thirty-five-years-ago. Naturally, conservative pundit Laura Ingraham dug into Blasey Ford’s past to learn a bit more about the woman drawing on a “repressed memory” to accuse a well-respected judge of attempting to rape her decades ago. Ultimately, Ingraham found a very sick skeleton in the liberal professor’s closet. In a last-ditch effort to stop President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick from being confirmed, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) released a surprising statement on Thursday accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct back in high school. The accusation, reportedly, is that Kavanaugh and another young man locked a woman in a room by herself during a party in high school. The woman was able to get out and was not harmed. “I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court,” said Feinstein. “That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.” Judge Kavanaugh issued a statement in response to the misconduct accusation on Friday morning, saying, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.” Then, in a Sunday interview, Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford revealed that she is Brett Kavanaugh’s high school-era accuser, claiming the judge pinned her down and groped her before she escaped some 35-years-ago. According to Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge was present at the time and witnessed the alleged assault. Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County. While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house. [Source: The Washington Post] Mark Judge has strongly denied the accusation, saying, “Now that the anonymous person has been identified and has spoken to the press, I repeat my earlier statement that I have no recollection of any of the events described in today’s Post article or attributed to her letter.” With Blasey Ford’s identity revealed, we have been able to glean more information about her, none of which lends credibility to her story. For starters, the letter she penned to Feinstein wasn’t her first. She also signed a letter for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) condemning President Donald Trump for strictly enforcing federal immigration laws. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 101641 TODAY NEWS
Kurt Russel Just SHOWED Overpaid Celebs It’s Time To Shut Up About Trump – Hits Them Where It Hurts!
 
02:52
Since the second that Donald Trump was declared as our next president, liberals have not stopped complaining about the outcome, even after more than a year with him in the White House. The despicable display reached the height of annoyance during every ego-stroking awards ceremony since President Trump was elected. All have turned into a Trump-trashing session for pissed of celebrities to get far too much off their chest about our unapologetic leader. However, not everyone in Hollywood shares the same opinion as the most outspoken offender, Meryl Streep, as Kurt Russell just showed her and all of Trump’s other famous foes that it’s time to shut up about our president. If you haven’t heard much from Russell lately, it’s because he falls into the rare category of celebrities who isn’t crying over Hillary Clinton’s loss and doesn’t feel that he needs to make his political opinions known. He’s simply doing what he’s paid well to do and wishes others in the biz would too. Since they continue to throw tantrums and trash Trump on a public stage, Russell reached his breaking point and finally fired back hard. “This is a business that’s heavily promulgated by people who have a politically liberal bent,” Russell began in his blistering beratement of these overpaid crybabies after what Streep said at the Golden Globes. “I don’t begrudge them that. I’m a libertarian; frankly, I think my liberalness goes far beyond theirs in a lot of ways,” he added, as reported by the American Lookout. “But yeah, we think differently, and maybe that’s cut me out of some things. I don’t care,” he said before dropping a brutal announcement on these Streep and her lemmings that left them burning. Explaining that they’re not empowered in this business by their disgraceful attitudes against our leaders, the badass actor said they better be prepared to put their money where their nasty mouths are since they could be out of work. “People know I get along great with all kinds of directors, all kinds of actors. And I tell you, you hire me, I will show up, 24/7, and I will give you 100%. I will help you fix whatever problems come up. You hire me, I’m your boy. It’s just, it’s all about the work. And when that’s done, I am done.” Kurt has said recently that “the last thing I like to watch is entertainers or actors get political,” which he just proved by clearly pointing out that nobody cares what celebrities have to say about politics, and that their obnoxious behavior only shows how unemployable they are. They need to just stick to what they are overpaid to do and leave the rest to the adults in charge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 167745 TODAY NEWS
After Noticing Aide’s Behavior Behind Feinstein, Body Language Expert Says They Betrayed Ford
 
04:37
There is an entirely different narrative to be understood about what someone is saying to you, and it goes far beyond listening to their words. It’s what people do when they speak, how they behave, what movements they make, that tells the story. Body language is sometimes far more telling than the actual words that come from someone’s lips. Mandy O’Brien studies body language. She’s become an internet go-to expert on reading the truth on many D.C. inhabitants. And she’s got some pretty interesting things to say about Sen. Dianne Feinstein regarding the leak of Palo Alto University Professor Christine Blasey Ford’s letter accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when both were in high school. In this video, O’Brien dissects every movement from Feinstein and those around her to come up with some fascinating conclusions regarding Feinstein’s statements in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings as she answers questions about the letter she received from Ford. Personally, I never believed Feinstein was telling the truth when she said she did not leak Ford’s letter, but O’Brien’s observations offer another interesting perspective. Feinstein says: “Mr. Chairman, let me be clear. I did not hide Dr. Ford’s allegations. I did not leak her story. She asked me to hold it confidential.” To that O’Brein responds: “OK, Feinstein has said two statements and neither one of them match. The other part of this, she’s written it down. I don’t know if she wrote it down during this hearing. It wouldn’t surprise me, but it’s suspicious to write it down. “What did she say? ‘I did not hide it,’ and ‘I did not leak it.’ So if you didn’t hide it, it means others knew, which kind of contradicts ‘I didn’t leak it.’ It’s a very ambiguous statement, especially since she went so far as to actually write it down so she stayed on point, just like lawyer-speak.” Interestingly, not only does O’Brien find Feinstein’s statements not credible and suspicious, but the rest of the chamber is completely detached and unenthusiastic about her remarks. Bored. At the 1:26 mark of the video, the camera gives us a wide angle shot of the room and the inattentiveness by the body is overwhelming. The body language by the rest of the committee is an enormous statement in itself. O’Brien also notes Feinstein speaks to the body of the chamber, but does not make eye contact, a very tell-tale sign of disingenuous behavior. “She’s not even actually looking up towards anyone of any status, at least in her mind,” O’Brien adds. It’s possible Feinstein believes she isn’t lying if she can dance around the truth on a technicality. “Now, there’s quite a few ways, especially since we’re dealing with lawyers, and they’re getting smarter, that you could approach this,” O’Brien says. “‘I did not leak,’ could mean she did not give anyone that letter because that part as she says it seems to be true. Her body sings with her. “Everything is peaches and cream, and alas you’ve followed your little law. But, you know, whispered bullet points, whispered names, that’s not leaking, at least in their mind,” O’Brien says. The next question is, if Feinstein didn’t leak, who did? A staff member possibly? Even if it wasn’t Feinstein herself, it was a betrayal nonetheless. And O’Brien gives a detailed description of a woman on Feinstein’s staff sitting behind her, and draws a conclusion that it is possible her staff could have been the culprit. “But confronted on if your staff leaked it. See how her head goes back almost like a defiance and then she watches Feinstein to see her reaction. ‘Are you going to stand up for us?’ It makes me suspicious if the staff was the ones that were leaking it, whether they actually leaked the documents or, as I said before, leaked those bullet points,” O’Brien says. Body language is a fascinating science. I can think of no better place to study it than inside the Beltway. There’s enough body language going on there to keep people watchers busy for a very long time. Hopefully, the Kavanaugh hearings won’t go on much longer and we can watch an excited Justice Brett Kavanaugh take his oath as he proceeds to his seat on the Supreme Court. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 102808 TODAY NEWS
HUGE Turn Of Events For Massive Caravan Of Honduran Invaders – Trump Gets Last Laugh!
 
02:16
Today, that massive caravan made it to the border of Mexico and Guatemala, but they have been hearing that Trump has made a deal with Mexico’s president. With this new information, a large group of immigrants may be deciding to turn around, Trump gets the last laugh! Daily Mail reports: The caravan of thousands of Honduran migrants marching towards the US dramatically turned around as they reached the Mexican border in Guatemala on Friday morning, a day after hundreds of their comrades faced off with police. The group say they will return to try to cross the heavily armed border and continue on their path to America in an hour, according to The Associated Press. They were two blocks from the border line in the Guatemalan town of Tecun Uman when they retreated. It is not an indicator that they have changed their plans, but demonstrates the obstacles the group is facing. On Thursday and Friday, the group clashed with police in the town and fought with them as Mexican man who was supporting the march was arrested. They are now making their way towards a bridge which traverses the Suchiate River. One migrant said: ‘One way or another, we will pass.’ Hundreds of Mexican police officers and troops have stationed themselves along the other side of the tall fence which separates it from Guatemala. Guatemalan troops are also said to be putting up resistance. Mexico has implemented what the ambassador to Guatemala calls a ‘metered entry’ system to try to control the vast numbers of people who are traveling there from other Central American countries. Late on Thursday night, a small number of the Honduran group who broke off from the main crowd were able to successfully cross over into Mexico. NBC reports that US officials are now tracking that small group as they make progress towards the US. The migrants are fleeing Honduras where they say they have no prospects. The developments on Friday came as Mike Pompeo prepared to fly to Mexico to discuss migration with the country’s officials. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 44335 TODAY NEWS
Christine Blasey Ford’s Parents Lost Court Case Involving Kavanaugh’s Mother
 
02:21
An unusual connection between Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, has some questioning her possible motives. Ford has accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault when they were teenagers in the 1980s. While the accusations seemed plausible, Ford’s motivations are now being called into question by some. According to records in the state of Maryland, the parents of Christine Blasey Ford were involved in a foreclosure case in 1996 and 1997 in which one of the judges was Martha Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh. While the exact details of the case are still unclear, it appears Ford’s parents were sued in a foreclosure case, which they lost. Martha Kavanaugh was not the deciding judge on the verdict or settlement, but her name is included as the presiding judge on several filings made by the plantiffs in the case. If Christine Ford knew Martha Kavanaugh was one of the judges involved, there could be some animosity towards the family over what was likely an emotional foreclosure case. Kurt Schlichter highlighted the discovery today on his Twitter account, but made it clear the details were uncovered by Richard Armande Mills of Turning Point USA. The revelations comes among other aspects of Ford’s life that some say may have motivated her to speak against Kavanaugh. As we reported earlier, Ford participated in a march against Trump in 2017, and even wore a variation of the “pussy hat” in the march. We also reported that Ford has strong ties to the Democratic party. The registered Democrat donated to Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign, and she is currently represented by Debra Katz, a liberal activist lawyer who calls herself a member of the Trump “resistance.” Heavy.com is reporting that Ford signed a letter earlier this year, signed by numerous professionals in the psychological industry, demanding that President Trump end the practice of separating illegal immigrant families at the border. Some found the connection just a bit too coincidental. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 17069 TODAY NEWS
FBI Just Raided Offices Of Trump Bashing Mayor – Uncovers Closet FULL Of Skeletons
 
03:50
Liberal leaders have enjoyed years of running amok of government and going unchecked. This has allowed many problems to flourish and was the cause of major scandals that didn’t need to happen, but were allowed, simply for political gain. However, those days are done now that a non-career politician isn’t in charge, is beholden to nobody, and acts only on the behalf of Americans. President Donald Trump promised to “drain the swamp” and hasn’t stopped doing just that since the since he was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. Considering the closet full of skeletons that just spilled out one mayor had locked up, it’s no wonder the fight against Trump is so strong and unyielding. The Daily Wire reports on the unexpected turn of events that hit an anti-Trump Mayor where it hurts: Early Tuesday morning, the FBI raided government offices in San Juan, Puerto Rico, including the office of San Juan’s mayor, Carmen Yelin Cruz, looking for evidence to substantiate allegations of “corruption” within San Juan’s city government. Cruz, of course, is the outspoken San Juan mayor who appeared regularly on television during and after Hurricane Maria last year, blaming the Trump administration for failing to address the situation in Puerto Rico. Cruz even donned a “Nasty Woman” shirt in one interview. She’s recently been making the rounds on late night television on the mainland, appearing on Stephen Colbert’s show to discuss (and condemn) the Trump administration’s hurricane response. But, as administration officials — including President Donald Trump — have pointed out, many of the problems rescuers faced were the result of local failures, including a lack of infrastructure, government favoritism, and rampant corruption. Cruz and others are alleged to have hampered, and occasionally blocked, the distribution of much-needed supplies to Puerto Ricans without food, water, medicine, or electricity. And now, it seems, the FBI is trying to get to the bottom of exactly what’s going on in San Juan. NBC News reports that “FBI agents were seen raiding an office on the 15th and 14th floor of Torre Municipal de San Juan, according to authorities. The operation was related to suspected corruption in the purchasing department.” “We are seeking documents and evidence that support this allegation,” an FBI spokesman told reporters, according to NBC. “This search will help us confirm if allegations are true or not. We will look through every document, bill, email … anything that will let us clarify the claims.” Cruz commented on the raid on Twitter, pledging her “total collaboration” with the FBI’s investigation: “If someone has done something wrong, they should be subjected to due process and face the consequences of their actions.” That might include Cruz. Fox News reports that the FBI’s investigation centers around whether Cruz and allies in the San Juan city government handed city business — and city money — to preferred companies, many of whom allegedly charged the city thousands more than other suppliers. Cruz’s former director of procurement, Yadira Molina, apparently blew the whistle on her own offices — and her boss, Mayor Cruz — last February reporting ““alleged irregular acts” to a local comptroller. Molina told officials that “a supply company was granted ‘preferred supplier’ status which paid them more than three times what regular suppliers made,” and that Cruz may have been responsible for inking the deal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 158749 TODAY NEWS
CNBC Poll Predicts Huge Loss For Democrats This November
 
02:18
A new poll from CNBC predicts a devastating loss for Democrats this November, despite exaggerated claims by Democrat politicians. For the last two years, Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media have been gloating that they are going to sweep the House and Senate in the midterms this fall. However, this new poll from CNBC pours cold water on those unrealistic claims. Per CNBC: With economic optimism soaring in the country, will Democrats be able to sweep to power in either house of Congress or will buoyant sentiment help Republicans keep hold of their Congressional majorities? The latest CNBC All-America Economic Survey offers mixed signals, but leans against a wave Democratic election like that those that swept Republicans to power in 2010 and 2014. The poll of 800 Americans across the country, with a margin of error of 3.5 percent, found a six-point Democratic lead on the question of who voters will choose in the November congressional elections. The 42 percent to 36 percent margin is not far from what pollsters would expect given the greater percentage of Democratic registered voters. “A six point differential is not something that’s going to cause a big electoral wave,” said Micah Roberts, the Republican pollster on the CNBC poll, a partner Public Opinion Strategies. “Economic confidence that people have among a lot of groups is providing a buffer” for Republicans. Indeed, the poll found that 48 percent of the public is optimistic about the current economy and optimistic it will get better, the highest level in the poll’s 11-year history and more than double the 20 percent registered in the December 2016 survey. Americanlookout.com reports: If Democrats fail to take the House or the Senate, the meltdown from the left will be even worse than after the 2016 election. Republicans can’t take this poll for granted, however. People must get out and vote. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 8273 TODAY NEWS
Ford’s Former BFF Leland Breaks Her Silence – Has Sick Details Of What Ford Did To Her Last Week
 
04:28
Christine Ford’s high school friend, Leland Keyser, was ‘completely blindsided’ and left ‘reeling’ when the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempted rape named her as a corroborating witness. Speaking exclusively to DailyMailTV a family member close to Keyser, 52, said: ‘Christine didn’t give her so much as a heads up – as far as I know they haven’t really spoken for several years and they’re certainly not close anymore. ‘Leland was completely blindsided by her name being thrown into it all. The first thing she knew about it was when she woke up on Thursday morning and her name was just everywhere. It was crazy.’ Pictured here for the first time since the news Ford had named her as a witness, Keyser showed the strain of being catapulted into this political maelstrom. The family member who asked not to be named explained: ‘She’s just trying to get through it and hoping for it all to die down. ‘It really felt a lot like Christine was the one called to the principal’s office to give an account of something and just threw her under the bus. You know, just reached for a name.’ Keyser’s attorney, Howard J Walsh III, last night confirmed that his client has spoken with the FBI and that when she did so she could not corroborate Ford’s account. Instead she doubled down on the statements she has already given to the Senate Committee in which she has denied all knowledge of the supposed party, the alleged assault or of Kavanaugh, 53. Ford, 51, accused the Supreme Court nominee of attempting to rape her in a drunken attack in 1982 at a home in Montgomery County near Columbia Country Club. According to Ford, Kavanaugh held her down and put his hand over her mouth to stop her screaming while he groped at her and pulled at her clothes. She said that she was afraid that he might ‘accidentally kill her.’ Ford claims that Kavanaugh’s friend, Mark Judge was in the room at the time. Both Kavanaugh and Judge – who has also been interviewed by the FBI – vehemently deny these charges. Patrick Smyth, another man named by Ford as a party-goer, and who attended Georgetown Preparatory School with Kavanaugh and Judge, has also denied being there. Keyser – whom Ford described as her ‘best friend’ at Holton-Arms preparatory school – was her final hope for corroboration. But Keyser’s relative revealed the mother-of-two’s shock at being named as a witness by a woman to whom she has barely spoken in recent years. And they expressed anger at Ford’s suggestion that Keyser could not recall the party because of the ‘significant health challenges’ she has faced in recent years. Ford attempted to brush aside Keyser’s statement telling members of the Senate Committee: ‘Leland has significant health challenges, and I’m happy that she’s focusing on herself and getting the health treatment that she needs, and she let me know that she needed her lawyer to take care of this for her, and she texted me right afterward with an apology and good wishes, and et cetera. ‘So I’m glad that she’s taking care of herself. I don’t expect that P.J. and Leland would remember this evening. ‘It was a very unremarkable party. It was not one of their more notorious parties, because nothing remarkable happened to them that evening. They were downstairs.’ Speaking in her defense Keyser’s loved one noted: ‘I think it’s quite convenient that she named the person who is frankly probably the least physically capable of all of them to stand up and be subjected to questioning or give her account.’ The family member went on to explain that the ‘health challenges’ faced by Keyser have not impaired her memory. But they admitted that being caught up in the Kavanaugh scandal has proved physically trying at a time when Keyser is not in good health. The relative said: ‘Leland is not a well woman. She has had years of injuries that have seen her have 14 operations on her neck and back. She just wants to get better.’ She is also under enormous emotional stress. An open letter to Keyser published on Tuesday in The Daily Caller dragged up a tragedy from her past in a bizarre attempt to cast doubt on Keyser’s insistence that she remembers nothing and push her to confront past memories, however painful. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 309676 TODAY NEWS
Democrat Congresswoman’s Staffer Arrested for Posting Home Addresses of GOP Senators Online
 
03:04
An intern for a Democratic member of congress was arrested Wednesday and charged with posting the personal information, including the home addresses, of Republican senators. The doxxing, as it is termed, occurred last week as senators spoke out in support of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The suspect is an intern for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas. U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed. Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as an unpaid intern for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He previously worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko’s name on it describes him as a “Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student.” Jackson Lee’s office told Fox News that Cosko had only worked there for a couple of months, but has now been terminated. Hassan’s office declined to comment. “It’s unfortunate,” Glenn Rushing, Jackson Lee’s chief of staff, told Fox News. Rushing added that the congresswoman’s office is “cooperating with law enforcement.” Personal information of Sens. Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch was posted on their respective Wikipedia pages as the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Kavanaugh over allegations that he assaulted Christine Blasey Ford at a high school party in the early 1980s. All three have professed their belief that Kavanaugh is innocent of the claims brought against him by Ford, with Graham telling the federal judge “you’ve got nothing to apologize for” amid a fiery rant denouncing Democrats’ handling of the claims. The intentional publication of the information was first caught by a Twitter bot that automatically tracks any changes made to Wikipedia entries from anyone located in the U.S. Congress and publicizes them on the social media site. The bot account later deleted the tweets because the edits contained personal information. According to the bot, whoever posted the information did so from a computer in the House of Representatives. The home addresses of the senators appeared to be correct, thought the phone numbers didn’t appear to be entirely accurate. A “home” phone number listed for Graham appeared to direct callers to the Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League (SMYAL), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 41732 TODAY NEWS
Kavanaugh Accuser’s Husband Breaks His Silence, Exposes The Sick Issue His Wife Has
 
05:39
Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh are still front and center. As of yesterday, she was confirmed to testify on Thursday in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee. That should be interesting as none of the four witnesses she has named back her version of her story. And now a second accuser has surfaced with ridiculous claims that even her best friend claims are suspect. Ford’s husband is now breaking his silence and what he says exposes the sick issue his wife has. Russell Ford, her husband, says Christine has long had issues with not getting “the attention or respect she felt she deserved.” Sounds like she has a craven obsession with attention and respect. Well, she’s getting attention… as for respect, not going to ever happen here. In fact, she’s made herself a laughing stock. From the Washington Post (of all places): “When Donald Trump won his upset presidential victory in 2016, Christine Blasey Ford’s thoughts quickly turned to a name most Americans had never heard of but one that had unsettled her for years: Brett M. Kavanaugh. “Kavanaugh — a judge on the prestigious U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia — was among those mentioned as a possible replacement for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in 2016. When Trump nominated Neil M. Gorsuch, Ford was relieved but still uneasy. “Then Justice Anthony M. Kennedy announced his retirement and Ford, 51, began fretting again. “Her mindset was, ‘I’ve got this terrible secret… What am I going to do with this secret?’” her husband, Russell Ford, 56, recalled. “To many, Kavanaugh was a respected jurist. To her, he was the teenager who had attacked her when they were in high school. “Ford had already moved 3,000 miles away from the affluent Maryland suburbs where she says Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a house party — a charge he would emphatically deny. Suddenly, living in California didn’t seem far enough. Maybe another hemisphere would be. She went online to research other democracies where her family might settle, including New Zealand. “She was like, ‘I can’t deal with this. If he becomes the nominee, then I’m moving to another country. I cannot live in this country if he’s in the Supreme Court,’” her husband said. “She wanted out.” “She didn’t always get along with her parents because of differing political views,” Russell said. “It was a very male-dominated environment. Everyone was interested in what’s going on with the men, and the women are sidelined, and she didn’t get the attention or respect she felt she deserved. That’s why she was in California, to get away from the D.C. scene.’” It sounds to me as if she hated Kavanaugh because he never paid attention to her and because of his politics. Personally, I don’t believe her story at all. I think this was a planned smear campaign from the left. Otherwise, as Lindsey Graham pointed out, why did she get a polygraph in August and retain an attorney at that time? I believe Ford definitely has issues of the mental variety. This whole thing reminds me of the Salem Witch Trials. Feinstein is now calling for an indefinite delay to Kavanaugh’s nomination. How convenient… that’s exactly what the left wanted before they came up with this dog and pony show. President Trump is not backing down on his support of Kavanaugh either. In fact, he’s doubling down on backing Kavanaugh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 505831 TODAY NEWS
After Ford’s Lawyer Tells Major Lie, DC Bar Association Delivers Devatating News
 
04:50
On CBS’ “Face The Nation” on Sunday, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) revealed that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyer was guilty of telling a major lie. Now, the D.C. bar association is stepping in to make her pay. Last week on Capitol Hill, the Judiciary Committee saw perhaps the tensest hearing in Senate history as Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh and the woman who has accused him of attempting to rape her 36-years-ago, Christine Blasey Ford, both told their sides of a decades-old story. On Sunday, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton sat down with CBS’ “Face The Nation” to offer his take on the debacle. “After watching the hearings — you were a supporter of Brett Kavanaugh’s — how did you process the new information that came out in the hearings?” asked anchor John Dickerson. Cotton replied by starting at the very beginning. “Well, John, first off, let’s understand why we had to have this hearing,” he said. “Miss Ford made these allegations in a confidential letter to Dianne Feinstein in July, shortly after Brett Kavanaugh was nominated. The very night he was nominated, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader, said that he would do everything in his power to stop the nomination. And that’s what happened.” “For three months, the Democrats have turned the advise and consent process into a search and destroy mission,” added Cotton, according to Breitbart. “These allegations are completely unsupported by any evidence. What evidence there is to a 36-year-old claim, all support Judge Kavanaugh’s denial. But the Democrats have disgraced this process and the United States Senate in the orchestrated smear campaign of character assassination they’ve run against Judge Kavanaugh.” Dickerson retorted, “Their argument, of course, was that Dr. Ford asked to have this held in confidentiality and that they tried to do that. And that’s what it was…” “No no no no no,” Cotton cut in, refusing to allow the news anchor the opportunity to spread more lies in defense of the Democrats. “No, John, let me talk to you about that,” said Cotton. “There is a well established process of confidentiality on the committee. Dianne Feinstein could have showed that letter to Chuck Grassley and the two of them, as the leaders of that committee could have shared it with the FBI who could have discreetly conducted this inquiry in July and in August without betraying Miss Ford’s confidences. And they have betrayed her. They pointed her to lawyers who lied to her and did not tell her that the committee staff was willing to go to California to interview her. Now, all of that is water under the bridge.” Then, the GOP senator dropped a bombshell that should have Feinstein and Ford’s uber-liberal legal team, including her attorney Debra Katz, sweating bullets: They’re all going to be investigated. “Those lawyers are going to face a D.C. bar investigation into their misconduct,” said Cotton. “Dianne Feinstein and her staff is going to face an investigation for why they leaked that. All of this could have been done discreetly. It happens hundreds of times — HUNDREDS OF TIMES — every year in the Judiciary Committee.” A stunned Dickerson tried to downplay the severity of what Sen. Cotton had just said. “It doesn’t happen… It doesn’t happen hundreds of times with… with issues that are this sensitive, but let’s…” Dickerson stammered. “No, John it does,” Cotton cut in. “It’s designed for issues that are sensitive, John. It’s designed for issues like this.” Of course, Feinstein and her minions were hoping no one would mention the Senate’s well-established process of maintaining the confidentiality of accusers. She could have done this the right way. She could have gone to Grassley and the FBI with Ford’s claims when there was still ample time for them to be investigated before Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing. But, instead, she sat on Ford’s letter for six weeks, never breathing a word, even as Kavanaugh participated in 65 different meetings with senators and testified for hours and hours before lawmakers. Then, on the eve of the judge’s confirmation, having been entirely unsuccessful at thwarting him through legitimate means, Feinstein finally made Ford’s allegations public, igniting a political firestorm. She ought to be investigated. So should Ford’s lawyers. They were complicit in this sleazy political hit job, and it has cost their client — and one of the finest judges in the history of our country — greatly. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 197003 TODAY NEWS
2nd Correction Made On Elizabeth Warren DNA Test Story, Warren Gets Mocked
 
03:29
Fake News media was so thrilled that Elizabeth Warren had a DNA test done that might prove Trump wrong they screwed up the story! So now Pocahontas & a lib news outlet are losers once again! Daily Wire reported: The Boston Globe had to issue a second embarrassing correction to their story claiming that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is Native American, admitting that the newspaper made “a math error.” Buried at the very bottom of the report, the newspaper issued the following correction: Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American. The embarrassing report from Annie Linskey even noted that the analysis of Warren’s genetic ancestry was based not on Native American DNA, but on Mexican, Peruvian, and Colombian DNA. Even more embarrassing, a comprehensive study by geneticists estimated that the average European-American has 0.18% Native American DNA, which may be higher than Warren. Warren’s gamble of desperately trying to prove her Native American ancestry appears to have backfired as she was widely mocked online. James Woods was quick to brand her as “Señorita Warren”: Jim Messina, the campaign manager for President Obama’s 2012 campaign, was left confused by Warren’s move: A 2012 report from The Atlantic noted that Warren was not a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, was not enrolled in the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, and was not one of the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee, “Nor could she become one, even if she wanted to.” To qualify for the Eastern Band of the Cherokee, Warren would need to be “at least 1/16 Cherokee to enroll — and also to have “a direct lineal ancestor” on ‘the 1924 Baker Roll of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.'” Warren is, at most, 1/64 Native American, thus she does not qualify. To qualify for the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee, Warren would need “a minimum blood quantum requirement of one quarter (1/4) degree Keetoowah Cherokee blood.” Again, Warren does not qualify. Warren’s maximum 1/64 Native American would not appear to be a barrier to her joining the Cherokee Nation, but she would be disqualified based on her inability to name a direct ancestor. The Atlantic reports: And while many have pointed out that the current principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, Bill John Baker, is only 1/32 Cherokee, his background is not like Warren’s; he was “born and raised in Cherokee County” and is a direct descendant of “Nancy Walker Osage, an early Tahlequah business owner and Cherokee Healer” listed on the Dawes Rolls. The difference between him and Warren is he has a direct-line ancestor clearly documented as a Cherokee whom he can name. So far, Warren has only been able to point to family lore. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 50914 TODAY NEWS
Four Shocking Polls Emerge That Should Have EVERY Democrat Concerned
 
05:20
Democrats have overplayed their hand by trying to destroy a good man’s life. The American people are mad – and new polls show they’re taking out their anger on Red State Democrats. Daily Wire The Democrats have pulled out all the stops, including openly discarding all notions of due process, to try to delay the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the belief that they will take the Senate come November. But a series of recent polls suggest that going all in on destroying Kavanaugh may have ended up destroying their larger goal of taking back the Senate. Multiple polls have found similar results regarding voter enthusiasm amid the Kavanaugh battle that should have Democrats very worried. A new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll published Wednesday found that the significant enthusiasm advantage the Democrats once enjoyed just three months ago has evaporated. “In July, there was a 10-point gap between the number of Democrats and Republicans saying the November elections were ‘very important,'” NPR reports. “Now, that is down to 2 points, a statistical tie.” In July, 78% of Democrats and 68% of Republicans said the election was “very important.” Now, 82% of Democrats and 80% of Republicans say it is very important. Independents’ enthusiasm has remained largely unchanged: 64% in July, 65% in October. Particularly interesting are the breakdowns by gender: Enthusiasm among Democrat women has slipped by 2 points from 81% to 79%, while enthusiasm among Republican women has surged by 12 points from 71% to 83%. Enthusiasm has jumped among Democrat men by 15 points from 73% to 88% and among Republican men by 12 points from 66% and 88%. “Democrats’ advantage on which party’s candidate they are more likely to support has also been cut in half since last month,” NPR notes. “Democrats still retain a 6-point edge on that question, but it was 12 points after a Marist poll conducted in mid-September.” Those findings are similar to the results of a recent Quinnipiac University National Poll released Tuesday and conducted after the Kavanaugh-Ford hearing, which found that 49% of voters said they support the Democratic candidate in their local race for the House of Representatives, while 42% back the Republican candidate. “That’s a 7-point gain for Republicans in just a week, with support for Democrats dropping 3% and support for Republicans rising 4%,” The Daily Wire’s Joseph Curl reports. “In the September 12 survey by Quinnipiac, Democrats held a 52 – 38 margin, so Republicans have cut the lead in half.” As Curl notes, a recent Gallup voter enthusiasm poll found similar results. “Sixty-one percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners and 58% of Republicans and Republican leaners say they are more enthusiastic about voting in November compared to prior elections,” Gallup reports. “These levels roughly match Republicans’ record-high enthusiasm in 2010, Barack Obama’s first midterm, when the GOP won a whopping 63 seats. But this is the first time in Gallup’s trend since 1994 that both parties have expressed high enthusiasm.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 38783 TODAY NEWS
Ford Advisor Revealed Plot To Take Down Kavanaugh In July Call
 
04:04
As many conservatives have believed from the beginning, Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh seem to be nothing more than a manufactured effort by the left to derail the judge’s confirmation. Now, we have evidence that the Democrats were plotting something all along. Ever since Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) revealed that she had received a letter from Palo Alto University professor Christine Blasey Ford accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of attempted rape 36-years-ago, we have been asking why the allegations were not brought forward sooner. Why did Dr. Ford wait until Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Donald Trump to make her claims? And why did Sen. Feinstein hold onto Ford’s letter for six weeks before making it public on the eve of Kavanaugh’s confirmation, when she had so many opportunities to address it before then? Now, we have our answer. In a July conference call to Democratic leaders, Ricki Seidman – a high-powered Democratic operative, former Clinton White House official, and current advisor to Christine Blasey Ford – laid out a strategy to defeat the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. “Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee,” Seidman said on the call. This was at the same time as Christine Blasey Ford sent her letter accusing Kavanaugh of attempted rape to Sen. Diane Feinstein. To truly understand the significance of Seidman’s ominous statement, you must first know a bit about her background. Seidman, currently an executive at a public relations company, has worked for the Dukakis, Mondale, and Clinton campaigns for president, according to The Daily Caller. She also served as Joe Biden’s communications director when he was named as Barack Obama’s running mate in the 2008 election, and managed the confirmation of Obama’s Supreme Court justice nominee Sonia Sotomayor. Recently, Seidman served as the executive director of the liberal voter turnout group Rock the Vote. She also served in Bill Clinton’s campaign’s “war room” and as deputy communications director in the Clinton White House. But most importantly, she is no stranger to high-profile fights over nominations to the Supreme Court by a Republican president. Seidman cut her teeth running attack ads against Robert Bork, a nomination that was eventually derailed. She then moved to Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy’s office, where she was instrumental in convincing Anita Hill to go public with her claim that Clarence Thomas sexually harassed her. Seidman was also instrumental in leaking the Hill story to the press when lawmakers didn’t take it seriously. “As legal director for Norman Lear’s People for the American Way, she was responsible for the infamous attack-ad on the judicial record of Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork,” reports The Weekly Standard. “She next moved to Senator Edward Kennedy’s office shortly after Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court, and she is credited with pressuring the reluctant Anita Hill to come out with her harassment story. When the Judiciary Committee failed to listen, according to David Brock’s The Real Anita Hill, Seidman helped leak the story to the press.” The Democrats knew all along that there was no way for them to legitimately defeat Kavanaugh — if they wanted to derail his confirmation, they would have to resort to dirty tactics, much the same way they did with Anita Hill during Justice Clarence Thomas’ confirmation. Sadly, this is nothing new. The Democrats are becoming like the boy who cried wolf, only, in this case, it’s more like “the random chick who cried sexual harassment at the eleventh hour.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 279812 TODAY NEWS
Ford ‘Exposed’ In Major Evidence – Dems Desperate To Bury It By ‘All Means Possible’
 
06:08
The truth always seems to prevail, even if it takes some time to get there. Luckily the left, along with main Kavanaugh accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, demanded and FBI investigation into her 36-year-old accusations, which was pretty ballsy given all that Blasey Ford seemingly has to hide. Perhaps she didn’t think that certain things would be uncovered, but now she’s unravelling at the seams and so are Democrats who have fervently pushed this accusation to facilitate their doomed agenda. Dr. Ford has allegedly been caught in a web of deceit and a research article she contributed to ten years ago has resurfaced recently. What’s particularly questionable about this material, is the subject matter that may have foreshadowed how she’s now retrieving decades-old memories to “create artificial situations,” according to professor and senior writer for The Federalist, Margot Cleveland. Despite her extensive and impressive educational background, Dr. Ford didn’t seem to think her high profile allegations through. She must have forgotten that she co-authored a study in which participants were taught SELF-HYPNOSIS and noted hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories. But more importantly, this study also taught how to “CREATE ARTIFICAL [sic] SITUATIONS,” Cleveland said on Twitter with photo evidence of the study’s existence and Ford’s part in it, which she also wrote for The Federalist. Cleveland and many other Kavanaugh supporters believe that this answers a lot of questions about what Ford is up to. While Dr. Ford’s purpose and suspected practice of “self hypnosis to create artificial situations” has not proven to have any part in her recent allegations against Kavanaugh, it has many people wondering if there’s any connection to this case and her behavior, who are now connecting the dots, without complete proof. We are not accusing Ford of using hypnosis to create “fake” memories, but simply stating that the correlation of her research study on this specific practice, paired with this current case, is causing conservatives to question Dr. Ford more than they already were. “Adding to the alarming retrieval of this information is that “Ford’s internet history was wiped clean before she made allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh stemming from an alleged incident 36 years ago,” Big League Politics reported. “In sum, the same woman whose allegations against Kavanaugh from 36 years ago, which depend on retrieving old memories, authored an academic paper on how to do just that via hypnosis, which is a fringe science at best,” Big League Politics concluded. What also seems a little suspect is how quickly this surprising material she was a part of authoring was squelched by large left-wing news outlets. Within minutes of Cleveland’s sounding the alarm with the documents on Twitter, left-leaning media watchdogs, Media Matters, published a piece discrediting the claim and of course referred to it as a “conservative conspiracy theory.” The exceptionally quick retort to Cleveland’s shocking discovery seemed very odd, to say the least. We have no idea how Media Matters was able to know that Ford was about to be exposed by her own written words in the 10-year-old study, investigate Cleveland’s findings to determine it to be false, all within minutes of her statements and evidence to back the claim up being published on social media. However, Media Matters seemed to have swiftly pulled something off, casting immediate doubt on what Dr. Ford meant when she wrote that. The site’s article slamming the so-called “conspiracy” casted immediate doubt on Cleveland’s assertion in the headline, based on their own claim, for anyone cross-checking what she retrieved. “Pro-Kavanaugh conspiracy theory suggests Christine Ford hypnotized herself into creating false memory of assault by Kavanaugh,” was the title and the article expounded on their own assertion of it being a “conspiracy” as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 183471 TODAY NEWS
Kavanaugh Wakes Up To Find A Very Personal Note From Trump – His Statement Says It All
 
02:41
Brett Kavanaugh is facing attacks on all sides. But he just got an emotional boost … from the President himself. From the moment President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, the left rioted. Some progressive groups protested, and before even knowing the man’s name! We knew Democrats would stoop to new levels to oppose this historic appointment, though. It’s what they do. Democrats have disgraced our government and Constitution with their shocking antics. Now, they have produced a questionable accuser, in the hopes of tarnishing Kavanaugh’s record, and undermining Donald Trump’s pick. But despite the vile attacks from the left, President Trump is standing up for his nominee. From IJR: “While some on the left might be pouncing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh over allegations of sexual assault, President Donald Trump is standing firmly by his nominee’s side… Trump responded to questions from the press, telling them he feels ‘badly’ for Judge Kavanaugh because of the sudden allegations…” “[Judge Kavanaugh] is an incredible individual, great intellect, great judge, impeccable history, in every way. In every way. I feel so badly for him that he’s going through this, to be honest with you. This is not a man that deserves this.“ Here’s the biggest question: why should Kavanaugh be disqualified over something that may or may not have happened 35 years ago? If we held everyone in government to that standard, there’d be no Democrats left! So many Democrats have fallen in the wake of the #MeToo trend. All due to horrible actions they committed, while adults in positions of influence. And each allegation was provable. Yet now Democrats are trying to take Kavanaugh down over a flimsy story from decades ago; something that has nothing to do with who he is today (given the fact that the story isn’t even true). And now, Donald Trump is standing behind Kavanaugh. He isn’t one to back someone half-heartedly; as a president and businessman, he selects only the best. That should be enough for the American people. In the end, Brett Kavanaugh and Trump will be vindicated. His accuser is already backing away from testifying, and even Feinstein is losing her grit. This entire episode will only blow up in the Democrats’ faces … as it rightly should. Do you also stand in support of Kavanaugh? Share if you do! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 23155 TODAY NEWS
Democrats Devastated! FBI Just Shut Down Final Effort To Stop Judge Kavanaugh
 
04:18
It’s not a good day to be a Democrat. In an eleventh-hour attempt to derail the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) accused the judge of sexual misconduct on Thursday. However, her final effort to stop the judge was just shut down by the FBI, leaving Democrats everywhere devastated. In a last-ditch effort to stop President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court pick from being confirmed, Sen. Diane Feinstein released a surprising statement on Thursday accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct back in high school. “I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court,” said Feinstein. “That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.” Despite Feinstein’s theatrics, however, the FBI is declining to investigate the matter, meaning they do not see any merit to the allegations. And, to add insult to injury for the Democrats, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said this little incident will not delay the confirmation process for Kavanaugh. Despite the turmoil over the letter, a spokesperson for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said there is no plan to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Grassley set the panel’s vote on Kavanaugh for Sept. 20 and Republicans hope to confirm Kavanaugh by the start of the new court session Oct. 1. “Sen. Grassley is aware of Senator Feinstein’s referral,” Grassley’s communications director Taylor Foy said in a statement. “At this time, he has not seen the letter in question, and is respecting the request for confidentiality. There’s no plan to change the committee’s consideration of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination.” [Source: Fox News] Senator Feinstein has had this information since July. And in that time, Kavanaugh has participated in 65 different meetings with senators, including Feinstein. At no time during those private meetings, however, did Feinstein bring up the alleged misconduct. Nor did she address it during the judge’s Senate confirmation hearing last week, when he sat through more than thirty hours of testimony. Furthermore, Kavanaugh already passed the FBI’s rigorous background check. If there was something nefarious to be found in his past, it would have already come out. However, we shouldn’t really be surprised by Feinstein’s dirty games at this point. For months now, we have watched the Democrats trot out every absurd strategy and ridiculous tactic they could think of in order to stop Trump’s nominee from making it to the Supreme Court. This is nothing new. Having failed to stop Kavanaugh, and with time running out, Feinstein released her damaging statement on the eve of his confirmation, even though she had had the information for months and had had more opportunities than we can count to confront him with it. There is simply no good reason for her to have sat on it for that long, especially after having had so many encounters with Kavanaugh when it could have been addressed. Either Feinstein knew from the beginning that the allegations were bogus, and thus, did not want to risk her reputation by making them public sooner, or she intentionally saved the information as a last minute hail mary in the event that the Democrats could not stop Kavanaugh by other means. Either way, it doesn’t lend any credibility to the anonymous and unsubstantiated claim against Kavanaugh’s character. Just like the majority of Americans who rolled their eyes when Feinstein released her statement on Thursday, the FBI saw right through the lies. This was an act of desperation by the Democrats to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation, just like they did to Clarence Thomas in 1991. It’s a dirty old trick. It didn’t work then, and it will not work now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 106121 TODAY NEWS
Migrant Caravan Takes Over Bridge, Gets Special Surprise On Other Side
 
03:34
Whoever is funding the migrant caravan can’t be too happy. They probably figured it would be allowed to traipse right up to the US border and walk in. I guess they didn’t figure in President Trump. He’s threatening to send in the military to stop the caravan, so Mexico is stepping up! WTOP is reporting: “Honduran migrants in a massive caravan surged across a bridge leading to Mexico on Friday before they were halted in a chaotic confrontation with a phalanx of Mexican police in riot gear. Chanting and cheering migrants pushed through or climbed over a steel gate until police threw tear gas and smoke canisters and pushed the migrants back. Video showed coughing and weeping migrants collapsed on the bridge. Several police and an undetermined number of migrants were injured. As night fell, thousands of migrants remained packed together and exposed to the elements on the Suchiate River bridge connecting Tecun Uman, Guatemala, and Tapachula, Mexico, according to CNN crews on the ground. As the migrants formed into lines, Mexican authorities allowed a trickle of them, starting with women and children, to pass through gates and board buses for refugee camps. It was unclear how many migrants would cross the border and how long that process would take. Mexican authorities have said they’d allow migrants to enter the country if they have valid visas or meet other requirements. The caravan formed last Saturday in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, and arrived in Guatemala on Monday. Migrants in the group told CNN en Español they were bound for the United States, seeking work and fleeing political corruption and violence. Leaders throughout the region have publicly urged them for days to turn back. Four Mexican police officers were injured in the standoff at the Mexican border, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Friday. Speaking to reporters on a tarmac in Mexico City, where he’d been meeting with leaders about the caravan and other matters, Pompeo accused the caravan of using women and children “as shields as they make their way through.” “This is an organized effort to come through and violate the sovereignty of Mexico,” Pompeo said. “We’re prepared to do all that we can to support the decisions that Mexico makes about how they’re going to address this very serious and important issue to their country.” Friday morning, members of the caravan gathered in the border city of Tecun Uman. They waited in sweltering heat for hours for others to arrive, packing streets for blocks on end. They streamed through gates on the Guatemalan side of the border around 12 p.m. Friday (2 p.m. ET), cheering and chanting as they marched. Celebratory air horns blared as they headed toward Mexico’s port of entry. When they reached a padlocked steel fence near the Mexican side of the bridge, the sheer numbers of the migrants allowed them to break through. Mexican police pushed them back. Hundreds of Mexican Federal Police sealed the border as drones and helicopters hovered above the crowd. At least a dozen migrants jumped into the river. It wasn’t known whether they were trying to swim across to the Mexican side of border, go back to Guatemala or just get relief from the crowds on the bridge.” And, the Mexican police decided not to let them pass. Boom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 138342 TODAY NEWS
Trump Is Opening Up Obama’s Secret Record, Will Reveal What All Of America Deserves To Know
 
05:59
At long last, the American people may FINALLY get some answers with regards to the Obama administration’s infamous gun trafficking scandal dubbed “Fast and Furious.” As the leftist progressives continue to look for non-existent Russian boogie men under their beds, the Trump administration is promising to release the documents pertaining to the scandal that former Attorney General, Eric Holder, refused to provide. Fast and Furious was one of many scandals under the Obama administration yet there were no special prosecutors appointed, no grand juries convened, no leaked memos to the New York Times by way of a friendly and oh-so-helpful professor from Columbia, and no mysterious anonymous sources speaking to the Washington Post. In case you have forgotten, Operation Fast and Furious was an operation during the Obama regime that worked in coordination with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) in which the federal government allowed criminals to buy guns in Phoenix-area shops with the intention of tracking them as they were transported into Mexico. However, the ATF lost track of more than 1,400 of the more than 2,000 guns they allowed smugglers to buy. Amanda Gonzalez, a spokeswoman for the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement to Fox News – “For over six years, the House Oversight Committee has fought for additional documents related to Operation Fast and Furious. Today, the Committee finally reached a conditional settlement with the Department of Justice. The Committee seeks all relevant facts so we can learn from the mistakes made by the Justice Department. We have a responsibility to uncover why they worked so hard to hide this information from the Committee, the family of slain border patrol agent Brian Terry, and the American people.” Terry was murdered in 2010 by an illegal alien with a weapon used in the epically botched Operation Fast and Furious. He died in a gunfight between Border Patrol agents and members of a six-man cartel “rip crew,” which patrolled the desert along the U.S.-Mexico border looking for drug dealers to rob. The cartel member suspected of killing Terry was apprehended in 2017. Terry’s family, specifically his brother Kent Terry want the scandal to be investigated and those responsible to be held accountable for their actions. Yet, Obama consistently states his administration was “scandal-free”. When reminded of scandals such as Fast and Furious that took place on his watch, Obama referred to them as “phony scandals”. American Thinker had this to say of so-called “phony scandals” stating – “Phony scandals are those that do not have a smidgeon of evidence of a crime, like alleged Trump collusion with the Russians or obstruction of an investigation that was never stopped or even slowed down. Phony scandals do not produce body bags as the Obama administration produced in Benghazi and during Operation Fast and Furious — the Obama administration’s gun-running operation in which it armed Mexican drug lords and cartels with heavy weapons for which the U.S. Border Patrol had no match or protection. That gun-running operation led to the murder of U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.” Well, it seems this announcement just blew the lid off of one of the Obama regime’s “phony scandals”… Reuters reports – “The U.S. Justice Department has agreed to provide congressional investigators confidential records on a failed gun-trafficking operation during the Obama administration known as “Fast and Furious” that long has been criticized by Republican lawmakers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 70981 TODAY NEWS
James Mattis Shared A Secret That Will Change Everything You Think
 
03:11
The fake news media is out to get James Mattis. So-called journalists ran with the idea that Donald Trump is about to fire him. But then Mattis revealed a secret that will change everything you think. Mattis Addresses The Fake News That Donald Trump Wants To Fire Him So-called journalists jumped for joy when Donald Trump said Mattis was a Democrat during a 60 Minutes interview. That let them play their favorite game of trying to claim Trump was about to fire him. The establishment believes Mattis is one of the few “adults in the room” keeping Donald Trump from plunging the world in chaos. Mattis took on this fake news when he recently met with reporters. “You know, we’re all built on our formative experiences. When I was 18, I joined the Marine Corps, and in the U.S. military we are proudly apolitical.,” Mattis began. He explained, “By that, I mean that in our duties, we were brought up to obey the elected commander in chief, whoever that is. And we’ve seen, over those — since I was in the military longer than some of you have been alive, I have seen Republicans and Democrats come and go.” Mattis then transitioned into addressing the rumors that Trump wanted to fire him. “Where am I today? I’m a member of the president’s administration. And you have seen that President Trump’s military policies, security policies, reaping significant bipartisan support,” Mattis stated. The Secretary of Defense continued, “So my role…and I realize you all write about tension between this person and that, this administration and that party, and this sort of thing. But when you think 83 percent of the U.S. Congress voting the same way on an issue put forward by the Republican president.” He also told reporters, “I’m on his team. We have never talked about me leaving,” Mattis Reveals His True Agenda Mattis told reporters that defending America is nonpartisan. “You can see that my portfolio is bipartisan by its very basis, and that is the protection of the United States. That’s what President Trump has told me to do, and I eagerly carry that out, alongside probably the most selfless young men and women not all young; some old men and women, too — civilian and military, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines working together,” he declared. The Fake News Refuses To Give Up But this won’t stop the media frenzy. They think if they can drive the idea that Trump is about to fire Mattis, then Republican voters will throw up their hands and abandon the President. Fake news reporters paint a picture of Mattis as one of the only Trump officials who maintains his credibility. However, Republican voters don’t support Trump because of who works for him—they stand by Trump because of his agenda. That is the biggest thing the media consistently overlooks. We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 67656 TODAY NEWS
Trump Threatens To Cut Aid To Honduras If It Doesn’t Stop Immigrant Caravan
 
02:32
President Trump isn’t messing around! It doesn’t matter who he’s dealing with, North Korea, Canada, Mexico, the EU, and now Honduras. If he thinks Americans are getting the raw end of a deal from a player, he takes them on, no-holds-barred. The Hill just reported: “President Trump on Tuesday threatened to cut off aid to Honduras if its government does not stop a migrant “caravan” from heading north toward the U.S. border. “The United States has strongly informed the President of Honduras that if the large Caravan of people heading to the U.S. is not stopped and brought back to Honduras, no more money or aid will be given to Honduras, effective immediately!” the president tweeted. The president was responding to reports that a group of 1,600 or more Hondurans hoping to reach the U.S. crossed the border into Guatemala on Monday. Members of the caravan have said they are fleeing poverty and violence in their home country in search of a better life. The U.S. gave $175 million in aid to Honduras in fiscal 2017, according to the United States Agency for International Development. Trump has long sought to crack down on illegal immigration, arguing that migrants bring crime and drugs into the country. He has highlighted the issue in the run-up to the November midterm elections in an effort to fire up his conservative base. The Washington Post recently reported the Trump administration is considering a policy that could again separate parents from their children as a way to stem the high numbers of families crossing illegally into the U.S. “We’re going to do whatever we can do to get it slowed down,” Trump told reporters on Saturday. “If they feel there will be separation, they don’t come.” The administration’s decision to enforce a “zero tolerance” policy on illegal immigration resulted in thousands of family separations at the southern border over the summer, triggering a massive political and humanitarian crisis for the president. Trump also expressed alarm about a similar “caravan” of Central Americans that traveled toward the U.S. in the spring. The vast majority of migrants did not cross the border, but a handful of asylum-seekers did enter the country.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 8212 TODAY NEWS
Dr. Ford & Friend FBI Agent Monica McClean Caught In Huge Polygraph Scandal
 
05:28
Christine Blasey Ford and her friend Monica McClean, who retired from the FBI in 2016, are caught in a huge scandal surrounding the leftist professor’s polygraph exam. Ford testified she had never “coached” anyone in how to take a polygraph, but then, her ex-boyfriend came forward saying she had coached McClean. But even though the retired FBI agent denies it, there’s something else we just learned about Ford and McClean that will blow your mind. Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley on Tuesday sent a letter to Ford’s lawyers renewing his request for “all audio or video recordings produced during the course of Mr. Hanafin’s polygraph examination of Dr. Ford as well as all polygraph charts and other data that Mr. Hanafin relied upon in preparing his report.” Grassley said that he made these requests before and after last Thursday’s hearing, but he has yet to receive them. “The full details of Dr. Ford’s polygraph are particularly important because the Senate Judiciary Committee has received a sworn statement from a longtime boyfriend of Dr. Ford’s, stating that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on polygraph examinations,” Grassley wrote. “When asked under oath in the hearing whether she’d ever given any tips or advice to someone who was planning on taking a polygraph, Dr. Ford replied, ‘Never.'” That letter from Ford’s ex-boyfriend named her friend as Monica McClean, who attended the Holton Arms school with Ford. Later, McClean became an FBI agent, and she was also roommates with Ford in California back in the 1990’s, according to the ex-boyfriend’s sworn statement: BREAKING: Fox’s @johnrobertsFox obtains letter from Ford ex-boyfriend alleging: dated for 6 yrs, never told of sex assault, Ford coached friend on taking polygraph, flew frequently w/o expressing any fear of flying/tight spaces/limited exits. Doesn’t want to b/c “involved”. — Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) October 3, 2018 Although McClean came out this morning denying anyone ever coached her on taking a polygraph, it’s interesting that Senator Chuck Grassley’s office did not redact McClean’s name from the letter. Why wouldn’t Grassley redact Monica McClean’s name? Well, Grassley must be aware of the other glaring issue surrounding McClean’s alleged current residence in Rehoboth, Delaware: The Conservative Treehouse reports, “According to her LinkedIn background, Ms. Monica Lee McLean, was a 24-year employee of the Department of Justice and FBI from 1992 to 2016. According to public records Ms. McLean worked in both Los Angeles, CA and New York, NY.” They add, “According to her LinkedIn profile, Ms. McLean retired from the FBI in 2016, after 24 years of work. [*It should be noted that Ms. McLean’s PIO partner in New York, Jim Margolin, is still currently employed there; and coincidentally attached to the case against President Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen.]” In April 2016, an article in the Delaware Cape Gazette stated Monica McLean showed up at a wine tasting event and was pictured within the publication. Her current residence is listed at Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, which aligns with public records and the article. Remember, Ford claims she wrote the letter accusing Brett Kavanaugh to Senator Dianne Feinstein on July 30th. Now, where did Ford testify she was located at the time she wrote the letter to Dianne Feinstein, accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh? MITCHELL: The second is the letter that you wrote to Senator Feinstein, dated the — July 30th of this year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 42112 TODAY NEWS
5 Major Problems With Dr. Ford’s Testimony That Could Ensure Kavanaugh Gets The Vote
 
05:49
The whole nation sat next to their TV yesterday to listen to the Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony where she accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of a sexual assault. There were two types of people watching yesterday. Those on the right who tend to watch with an open mind and try to be fair and those on the left are basically ruled by nothing more than emotion and their hate towards conservatives and the white American male. The same white American male who is responsible for the creation of our great nation but now seems to be branded as the evilest thing since the creation of Satan. Leaving aside all the left wing hate, if you actually listened to Dr. Ford’s testimony, you couldn’t help but find at least five inconsistencies and contradictions. Here is more via PJ Media: “1. She still can’t confirm the basics of her account She can tell everyone definitively that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her, but she doesn’t know when, where, who took her there or picked her up (she was 15), or pretty much anything of significance. She has no facts, no corroboration, no medical report, no police report. There is nothing but a claim from a woman with a bad memory and a story contradicted by all her own witnesses. At this point, there is not even any evidence that there was a party at all, much less that Kavanaugh was there or that anything happened between Kavanaugh and Ford. 2. There’s the polygraph weirdness Rachel Mitchell, a sex crimes prosecutor in Maricopa County, Arizona, who questioned Ford today, went out on what seems to be a strange tangent about the polygraph that Ford took in August. Surprisingly, it still prompted Ford to say a couple of very strange things. Ford said the polygraph was done in Maryland because of her grandmother’s funeral and she was asked if it was done on the same day as her grandmother’s funeral. Ford did not know the answer to that question. Mitchell also asked if she paid for the polygraph, which would normally be quite expensive, and again, Ford said she doesn’t know. If Ford doesn’t have a clear memory of big events that happened to her LAST MONTH, how can anyone be sure her memory of what happened 36 years ago is correct? Was Kavanaugh involved? You wouldn’t think someone could get confused about something like that, but you’d also think someone would know if she spent thousands of dollars paying for a polygraph last month. 3. She could have testified in California At one point, in response to Mitchell’s comment about how this wasn’t the best forum to explore her allegations, Ford agreed it would have been better if she could have testified at home without having to do this publicly in D.C. — except she could have done exactly that. Not only was the offer made to her legal team, but there were also news articles about it. It was not a secret. So either Ford is lying or perhaps worse yet, she really doesn’t know what’s going on and her legal team unnecessarily tossed her into the meat grinder for political purposes. 4. Ford’s fear of flying is fake Ford’s own lawyers have been publicly claiming that she’s too frightened to fly and they have gone out of their way to say that she won’t get on a plane because of the Kavanaugh incident. Because of that, they said she’d have to drive cross-country to get to a hearing. Of course, she actually flew. Additionally, under questioning, she admitted she had flown to Maryland, Hawaii, and Tahiti. In other words, that was a bald-faced lie. If she is lying about that, what else is she lying about? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 31369 TODAY NEWS
Monica Lewinsky Shut Down Hillary With One Awful Truth About What Bill Did To Her
 
03:16
Hillary Clinton’s disastrous comeback rolls on. Clinton tried to enter the midterm election campaign. But Monica Lewinsky shut her down by revealing this awful truth about what Bill Clinton did to her. Hillary Clinton’s CBS Interview Backfires Hillary Clinton sat for an interview with CBS Sunday Morning. It was a disaster. Clinton shocked millions of Americans when she claimed Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky was not an abuse of power. She said that because Lewinsky was an adult and the relationship had been consensual, Bill Clinton did nothing wrong. Critics blasted Clinton for this statement. They argued it was an abuse of power. Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky was not a normal workplace romance. He was the President of the United States. She was a 24-year-old intern. The power imbalance went well beyond what would be acceptable in a typical workplace environment. Monica Lewinsky Disagrees There was one person who disagreed with Clinton’s comment that Bill’s affair with Monica Lewinsky was not an abuse of power. Monica Lewinsky. Back in March, she wrote a piece for Vanity Fair discussing her role in the #MeToo movement. Lewinsky stated that Clinton carrying on an affair with her was an abuse of power: THERE ARE MANY MORE WOMEN AND MEN WHOSE VOICES AND STORIES NEED TO BE HEARD BEFORE MINE. (THERE ARE EVEN SOME PEOPLE WHO FEEL MY WHITE HOUSE EXPERIENCES DON’T HAVE A PLACE IN THIS MOVEMENT, AS WHAT TRANSPIRED BETWEEN BILL CLINTON AND MYSELF WAS NOT SEXUAL ASSAULT, ALTHOUGH WE NOW RECOGNIZE THAT IT CONSTITUTED A GROSS ABUSE OF POWER.) AND YET, EVERYWHERE I HAVE GONE FOR THE PAST FEW MONTHS, I’VE BEEN ASKED ABOUT IT. MY RESPONSE HAS BEEN THE SAME: I AM IN AWE OF THE SHEER COURAGE OF THE WOMEN WHO HAVE STOOD UP AND BEGUN TO CONFRONT ENTRENCHED BELIEFS AND INSTITUTIONS. BUT AS FOR ME, MY HISTORY, AND HOW I FIT IN PERSONALLY? I’M SORRY TO SAY I DON’T HAVE A DEFINITIVE ANSWER YET ON THE MEANING OF ALL OF THE EVENTS THAT LED TO THE 1998 INVESTIGATION; I AM UNPACKING AND REPROCESSING WHAT HAPPENED TO ME. OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Feminists Remain Silent On Clinton’s Comments Liberals proved that the #MeToo movement is only a political weapon to attack conservatives by staying silent after Clinton’s comments. The left-wing Huffington Post reached out for comment to the National Organization for Women, Time’s Up, Planned Parenthood, UltraViolet, and the Feminist Majority. Only the National Organization for Women responded—and they merely declined to comment. The Huffington Post noted that only Hollywood actress Alyssa Milano, who appeared at the Brett Kavanaugh hearing to support his accuser, and Tarana Burke—who started the #MeToo campaign in 2006—tweeted or commented on Hillary’s statements. Do you think Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky was an abuse of power? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 283814 TODAY NEWS
With 1 Statement Trump Had Caravan Organizer in Custody & 3 Countries Desperately Trying to Stop
 
02:46
President Donald Trump has Central American countries desperately scrambling to stop a caravan of illegal immigrants moving steadily toward the United States after Trump threatened to stop giving them aid if they refuse to stop it. On Tuesday, Trump explained on Twitter that El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, where the caravan originated, would lose payments from the United States if they refused to take action on their borders. “We have today informed the countries of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador that if they allow their citizens, or others, to journey through their borders and up to the United States, with the intention of entering our country illegally, all payments made to them will STOP,” Trump wrote. Trump is referring to the huge caravan of immigrants heading toward Mexico and the United States. By Wednesday, the “caravan” had grown to the size of 4,000 people, according to NBC. But Trump’s statement was apparently enough to get the Central American countries’ attention, as it looks like Guatemalan and Honduran police have been sending people back. Not only that, but Guatemalan police took one of the organizers of the caravan, Bartolo Fuentes, into custody along with three associates, according to Reuters. The bad news is that the officers on the Honduran border with Guatemala have been unsuccessful in stopping everyone. “We can’t attend to people en masse. People are going through one by one,” Honduran police spokesman Alex Madrid said. The Mexican government is even trying to chip in by sending 500 Mexican federal police to its border with Guatemala, according to NBC. On Thursday morning, Trump issued a Twitter post to make his position even clearer. Amid the tension, the illegal immigrants have been trying to justify illegally entering foreign countries. “These people are fleeing. These people are not tourists,” the arrested organizer, Fuentes, said. Nobody ever thought they were tourists, Fuentes. Everybody recognizes the caravan for what it is. It’s a giant group of thousands of people who want to break the laws of the United States by entering the country illegally. That’s the definition of starting off on the wrong foot. If the illegal immigrants are seeking employment and benefits, they will likely have to break the law again by using fraudulent documents. However, a lot of this may be avoided with Trump’s tough stance on illegal immigration and Central American governments scrambling to stop the caravan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 17598 TODAY NEWS
Kavanaugh’s Ex-Girlfriend Erupts on ‘Offensive and Absurd’ New Allegations
 
03:57
In a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the woman named in a fourth anonymous accusation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh vigorously denied that Kavanaugh behaved in the manner alleged, The Washington Times reported. The allegations had been made by the mother of a witness to the incident in a letter to Colorado GOP Sen. Cory Gardner, according to the Denver Post. It dated back to 1998, during Kavanaugh’s time with the Ken Starr investigation in Washington, D.C. “Her friend was dating him, and they left the bar under the influence of alcohol. They were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually,” the letter read. “There were at least four witnesses, including my daughter.” The letter contained no name or return address when it arrived at Sen. Gardner’s office last Saturday. “Upon receiving the anonymous letter, we immediately notified the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is handling the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. The letter was shared with both Republican staff and Democrat staff,” Gardner’s office said in a Wednesday statement. On Friday, however, the woman who was dating Kavanaugh at the time — Dabney Friedrich, currently a U.S. District Court judge in Washington D.C. — repudiated the contents of the letter. “I write in response to a phone call I received this evening from Mike Davis, Chief Nominations Counsel for the Committee. In our phone call, Mr. Davis read an anonymous letter sent to Colorado Senator Cory Gardner dated September 22, 2018,” the statement to the Judiciary Committee read. “Mr. Davis asked me (1) whether I dated Brett Kavanaugh in 1998 and (2) whether he ever shoved me against a wall. Mr. Davis also emailed me the attached letter and asked me to provide an immediate and written response to the Committee. “As I informed Mr. Davis, I dated Brett Kavanaugh in 1998. To the extent the attached letter is referring to me as the ‘friend [who] was dating him,’ the allegations it makes are both offensive and absurd,” it continued. “At no time did Brett ever shove me against a wall, including in an ‘aggressive and sexual’ manner. When we dated, Brett always treated me with the utmost respect, and we remain friends to this day. I have never observed (nor am I aware of) Brett acting in a physically inappropriate or aggressive manner toward anyone.” So, we have an anonymous letter to a senator with odd misspellings (including that her daughter was “wondering what to due about it”) versus the word of a federal court judge who dated him and was allegedly the target of this inappropriate behavior. This again brings us back, realistically, to two accusations (unless you believe the strange tale that came out of Michael Avenatti, which — well, the mere name Avenatti is sort of the imprimatur of a farce, and his involvement in this is yet more proof). One accuser has testified, the other initially refused to but is now saying she might. The key here seems to be throwing as many accusations as possible in Kavanaugh’s way. Eventually, the reasoning goes, he’ll have to withdraw his nomination. Kavanaugh hasn’t withdrawn yet, and thus far, the Trump administration seems to be backing him up. Perhaps most ominously for the Democrats, this latest allegation makes their case look even shakier. Whether this changes anything remains to be seen, but this can’t be seen as a positive augury for those looking to run out the clock on the Kavanaugh nomination. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 120179 TODAY NEWS
This Tweet Exposed Kavanaugh’s Accuser’s Biggest Lie
 
03:27
Christine Blasey Ford finally told her story under oath. No one could believe what she said. And this one tweet exposed her biggest mistake. Christine Blasey Ford Gives Conflicting Testimony Ford claimed she could not immediately testify because she was afraid of flying. She said she needed time to drive cross-country from California to Washington, D.C. Trump supporters suspected she was not telling the truth. They believed she was stalling for time. This delay allowed two other women to make more baseless allegations against Kavanaugh. Both women’s stories were so full of holes that the New York Times would not print them. And after yesterday’s testimony, Republicans suspicions were proven correct by Ford herself. She admitted her fear of flying was suspect. Rachel Mitchell, the outside prosecutor hired by Republicans to question Ford, asked her how she got to Washington. “I was hoping … to avoid having to get on an airplane,” Ford responded. “But I eventually was able to get up the gumption with the help of some friends and get on the plane.” Mitchell asked, “When you were here in the Mid-Atlantic area back in August, end of July, August, how did you get here?” “Also by airplane,” Ford answered. Mitchell noted that Ford likes to surf and has listed “Hawaii, Costa Rica, South Pacific Islands, and French Polynesia” as prime surfing locations. “Have you been to all of those places?” Mitchell asked. Ford said she had and that she traveled by plane to all of them. Ford Has Major Credibility Issues Ford lying about not being able to fly in for the committee hearing was just one of her major credibility issues. Donald Trump, Jr. noted that Ford developed a very convenient fear of flying. Donald Trump, Jr. tweeted: “I’M NO PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSOR BUT IT DOES SEEM WEIRD TO ME THAT SOMEONE COULD HAVE A SELECTIVE FEAR OF FLYING. CAN’T DO IT TO TESTIFY BUT FOR VACATION, WELL IT’S NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL.” Conservatives pointed out other issues with Ford’s testimony. Mollie Hemmingway of The Federalist tweeted: “SOME PEOPLE MAY FIND BLASEY FORD CREDIBLE. OTHERS WILL NOT. THAT’S WHY EVIDENCE, AND NOT SUBJECTIVE EMOTIONS, IS THE MEASURE TO USE TO SEEK JUSTICE. FORD CAME AND LEFT THE HEARING WITH NO CORROBORATION. TODAY ALSO REVEALED SOME TROUBLING INCONSISTENCIES.” Ford’s testimony was emotional. But it lacked substance, and most importantly, evidence. She offered no corroboration for her claims. And there were troubling contradictions. The Washington Post reported her story based on the fact that they had reviewed her therapist’s notes from a 2012 counseling session. However, Ford would not say if the Post actually saw her notes. In addition, she could not give a straight answer as to how many people were at the party where she claimed Kavanaugh tried to rape her. Trump supporters went into the hearing believing the Democrats were exploiting Ford’s claim for political gain. Ford’s inability to deliver a credible testimony only further proved that theory. We will keep you up to date on all new developments in this ongoing story. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 17426 TODAY NEWS
Limbaugh Notices ‘Professional’ Voice Technique During Ford Testimony
 
04:10
It’s quite possible that Christine Blasey Ford’s appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee last month may end up being the most scrutinized piece of testimony ever given before Congress. Whichever way the vote on Brett Kavanaugh goes, either side is going to look to it for years to come. If he’s confirmed, the Democrats will look to her “credible allegations” as proof that the Republicans were willing to do anything to confirm Kavanaugh. If he isn’t, Republicans will continue to bring up the inconsistencies in her story and malign the left for destroying the judge’s career. You can probably suss out my stance on this. I could go on about the shifting timeline, the total lack of corroboration, the failure to release her therapist’s notes to investigators or the fact that she has no idea how she got home. However, Rush Limbaugh noticed something else about the testimony that made him suspicious: Ford’s vocal technique during her testimony. In a back-and-forth during his Tuesday show, Limbaugh addressed a caller who said that Ford’s “whole demeanor and her body language, it was just so rehearsed and coached.” “You know, we had … I didn’t get to this yet. I had an audio sound bite,” Limbaugh said. “A Hollywood actress or an actress somewhere that I’ve never heard of did a video impersonation of Dr. Ford, and it was so spot on, and it was exactly… I noticed her speech pattern,” he continued. “Those of us whose profession involve the voice know very well the various vocal techniques that professional vocalizers use, and she used to a great effect what is called uptalking or up-speaking, and that means to end every sentence on an up note.” Uptalking, Limbaugh said, “promotes the idea that you’re young and innocent and vulnerable, and it’s what you say was the little girl type voice.” As for the Hollywood actress, who was unnamed, she ended up “being destroyed. She had to apologize for it and tell everybody she supports Dr. Ford, she just was amazed and she wanted to do her impersonation to show her talent, but it got taken down, and I didn’t get a chance to get to the video.” For those of you curious, it’s actually the voice of Princess Leia in the new “Star Wars Resistance” cartoon series. Here’s the video itself, if you’re more curious. “But you notice, you hear the uptick there. It is said that this is how valley girls, California valley girls speak,” Limbaugh said. “It’s not just them. It’s young girls, teenage girls sound this. And very vulnerable. That’s key to this. The key to Blasey Ford’s speech pattern was sounding vulnerable and scared and just totally innocent and, (impression of Christine Blasey Ford), ‘Why am I here? I, I, I think sooooo. I, I, I’m not suuuuure,’ and it just works. It makes you think that whoever you’re hearing is scared to death, is very vulnerable; couldn’t possibly be lying. “But how many 53- or 55-year-olds do you hear speaking that way?” he concluded. This proves little on its own, of course. In concert with the other evidence — particularly the report from Rachel Mitchell, the sex crimes prosecutor brought on by the committee — Limbaugh feels it makes a compelling case for doubt. Democrats, of course, don’t agree. “The female prosecutor the Republicans hired, Rachel Mitchell, has put together a devastating forensic analysis of Dr. Ford’s testimony, and it is… I’ve got that here, but it prints out to eight pages,” Limbaugh said. “I mean, it is just devastating on the substance. Forget the way she spoke and how she appeared and so forth. And the Democrats are acknowledging it as (impression) ‘Well, she’s partisan. We can’t we can’t take seriously a thing that that woman says.’ And they’re so rejecting it.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 79877 TODAY NEWS
After ABC Expresses Regret for Firing Roseanne, James Woods Offers Her Some BRILLIANT Advice
 
02:45
James Woods took to Twitter, where he relished in the recent story that ABC execs now are having second thoughts and regrets over firing Roseanne Barr. Woods said that he hopes Roseanne Barr sues their “asses” off. Bizpacreview.com James Woods embarked on a tweet-storm Saturday, lending his important voice to a whole range of current topics, beginning with the report that senior executives at ABC believe they overreacted in firing comedian Roseanne Barr for her controversial tweet, saying it would have been more appropriate to suspend her. “They’ve no doubt tested with focus groups. This was a billion dollar catastrophe for them,” Woods tweeted. “I hope she hijacks their asses for a fortune when they slip on the knee pads and start begging for her to come back.” And while it’s believed that Barr gave ABC the blessing to do a “Roseanne” spin-off, Woods asked about the possibility of another network — Fox? — doing a sitcom with Barr. “Serious question: does ABC own Roseanne’s name? I always heard that titles can’t be copyrighted,” Woods tweeted. “I’m probably wrong, but what if another network decided to do a different Roseanne Barr sitcom? What degree of material change is required?” He commented on the wisdom of firing the title character of a show on Friday. “Well, in general, firing the title character of any hit show (centered solely around that character) is hardly the apex of business acumen. This should be blatantly obvious to the most casual practitioner of programming,” Woods remarked in the tweet. “The Conners,” the spin-off of “Roseanne” sans the original show’s namesake, is set to launch on October 16 and its ratings may soon tell the tale. Other topics Woods weighed in on Saturday include the Kanye West controversy, as he noted that the rappers actions are “beautiful to behold.” “The world gets stranger and more wondrous every day,” he said in another tweet. The actor noted how CNN’s Don Lemon attacked West in a racist tirade that ridiculed him for “sitting with white people,” comparing his actions a “minstrel show,” even as he included a photo of the gay anchor and his white boyfriend. “This is CNN,” he added. And while taking on serious topics, Woods didn’t not lose his cutting sense of humor, as seen in a tweet recognizing the “funniest person on Twitter.” “#WorstNakedActivity: Kick boxing with Lena Dunham,” the lucky recipient tweeted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 16086 TODAY NEWS
Another Error is Found in Kavanaugh Accusers Story and It’s a BIG ONE
 
03:08
The despicable Democrats are pulling out all the stops to try and derail the Judge Kavanaugh vote for SCOTUS. They’re now claiming that Judge Kavanaugh attacked a woman in high school, nearly killing her. The woman, whose story has more holes than a slice of swiss cheese, claims there was a man in the room who witnessed the entire thing. One big problem. That man, says it never happened. Daily Caller A former classmate of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s is vehemently denying allegations that the Supreme Court nominee attempted to force himself onto a young woman during a party in high school. Mark Judge, who attended Maryland’s Georgetown Preparatory School with Kavanaugh in the 1980s, told The Weekly Standard on Friday that the assault allegations were “just absolutely nuts.” “I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said. Details of the alleged assault were first reported Friday morning by the New Yorker, which published the account of an unnamed woman who said Kavanaugh and a male classmate accosted her at a party. The woman alleged that Kavanaugh held her down and covered her mouth while the classmate turned up music in the room to conceal the sound of her protests. The New Yorker story did not identify the classmate by name, but Judge confirmed to The Weekly Standard that he was the Kavanaugh associate the accuser named. Judge said he had no idea he was named in the allegation until the New Yorker’s Ronan Farrow interviewed him about it. “[Ronan Farrow] said: As you know, you’re named in the letter. And I did not know,” he told the Weekly Standard. Judge went on to say the New Yorker refused to tell him the name of the woman who had made the allegation or any details about where and when the assault may have occurred. The unnamed woman has declined to give interviews with other media outlets. Months before speaking with the New Yorker, the anonymous accuser sent a letter describing the alleged incident to Democratic Rep. Anna Eshoo of California. Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California has also been in possession of the allegations since July. Feinstein, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, did not raise the allegation during Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing earlier this month. Nor did the matter come up during a closed session where sensitive information was discussed, according to a Judiciary Committee spokesperson. Feinstein said Thursday that she had forwarded allegations concerning Kavanaugh to the FBI. The referral did not trigger a criminal inquiry, but the FBI provided the information to the White House for placement in Kavanaugh’s background check file, USA Today reported. Kavanaugh denied the allegations against him in a written statement released by the White House on Friday, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation,” he said. “I did not do this back in high school or at any time.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 132196 TODAY NEWS
FBI Raids Office Building of San Juan’s Mayor Yulin Cruz
 
02:45
Just weeks after President Trump alleged corruption by yhe anti=Trump San Juan mayor, regarding hurricane relief supplies and funds, her offices were raided by the FBI. The Hill FBI agents raided San Juan’s municipal building on Tuesday amid an investigation into purchasing practices used by city officials, including Mayor Carmen Yulín Cruz. Video posted on Twitter shows several uniformed FBI agents proceeding into the building Tuesday morning. Local journalist Luis Guardiola noted in a tweet that “dozens” of FBI agents were involved in the raid. A spokesman for the agency told news service elnuevodia.com that Tuesday’s raid was related to an ongoing investigation into whether the mayor’s office and other city officials had shown favoritism when the city agreed to a contract with the company BR Solutions for $4.7 million over two years. BR Solutions is owned by Leonel Pereira O’Neill, a Puerto Rican businessman who has donated to the campaigns of several local politicians, including Cruz’s, according to the news service. “The raid helps us to confirm whether the allegations of irregularities are substantiated or not,” FBI spokesman Carlos Osario told the website. “We are filling out a search warrant, looking for documents and evidence that can support the allegation [of favoritism],” he added. The raid came several weeks after President Trump singled out Cruz while attacking Puerto Rican officials for the slow recovery efforts on the island, accusing the municipal officials of allowing widespread corruption. “It was a total mess, it was corrupt — couldn’t be worse,” Trump said in an interview last month. “The storms hit and they said, ‘Oh let’s blame Trump for the electric, let’s have Trump — let’s have Trump fix the electric plant,’ which takes a long time to rebuild it, which is a big deal.” Cruz reacted to the raid in a series of tweets Tuesday morning, pledging her office’s full cooperation with authorities. “At the moment, members of the FBI are intervening in the Municipal Tower of San Juan. My instructions as always are of total collaboration,” Cruz wrote in Spanish on Twitter. “At this time, I do not have more information. We all have the duty to collaborate to clarify this situation. If someone has done something wrong, must be subjected to a due process and face the consequences of their actions, ” she added. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ◆ Latest news videos: http://bit.ly/2Kn8KeN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ★ CONNECT WITH US ★ ◆ Google+: http://bit.ly/2LPVNjq ◆ Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Videos can use content-based copyright law contains reasonable use Fair Use (https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/)
Views: 9271 TODAY NEWS